Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Plast Surg. 2023 Jan 25;50(2):289–299. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.10.001

Table 1.

Review of patient and PAP flap characteristics across 10 studies.

Study Year Study Type Mean Age (years) Number of Patients/Number of Flaps Mean BMI (kg/m2) Mean Flap Weight Range (grams) Mean Pedicle Length (cm)
Hunter et al 2015 PC - 13/22 21.6 242 (132–455) -
Haddad et al 2016 PC - 30/30 - 301 (195–700) 9.88
Ito et al 2016 RR 41.6 5/7 23.5 257.1 (200–350) 9.4
Hupkens et al 2016 PC 44 30/40 23.3 372.4 (250–470) 11
Allen et al 2016 RR 48 96/164 22.5 367.4 (225–739) 10.2
Haddock et al 2017 RR - 56/101 26.4 425 (170–815) 10.3
Fosseprez et al 2017 RR - 15/17 - - -
Haddock et al 2019 RR 51.5 20/40 27.3 398.5 (170–600) 12.9
Haddock et al 2020 RR - 138/265 26.5 403 (190–800) 11.2
Atzeni et al 2021 PC 47.56 86/116 24.72 251.3 (152–455) -

RR: Retrospective Review; PC: Prospective Cohort Study; BMI: Body Mass Index; cm: centimeters; min: minutes