Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 5;24:742. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09802-7

Table 2.

Comparison of the performance of StableDNAm with six state of the art models on the seventeen datasets

Indicator Models D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 D16 D17
ACC iDNA_MS [37] 0.948 0.968 0.711 0.824 0.704 0.712 0.838 0.856 0.711 0.896 0.923 0.884 0.855 0.786 0.856 0.734 0.845
iDNA_ABT [38] 0.949 0.969 0.825 0.842 0.703 0.738 0.854 0.890 0.733 0.912 0.927 0.898 0.826 0.801 0.874 0.774 0.869
iDNA_ABF [39] 0.949 0.966 0.814 0.851 0.680 0.687 0.859 0.864 0.729 0.917 0.938 0.902 0.789 0.826 0.880 0.730 0.878
BERT6mA [34] 0.947 0.963 0.773 0.822 0.691 0.735 0.853 0.902 0.721 0.882 0.926 0.896 0.781 0.813 0.874 0.752 0.863
Deep6mA [33] 0.932 0.960 0.760 0.850 0.687 0.737 0.861 0.902 0.729 0.920 0.925 0.899 0.816 0.801 0.872 0.762 0.842
MM-6mAPred [31] 0.906 0.931 0.773 0.764 0.689 0.670 0.755 0.722 0.670 0.809 0.851 0.823 0.786 0.745 0.747 0.705 0.751
StableDNAm 0.949 0.968 0.853 0.853 0.710 0.743 0.861 0.909 0.745 0.923 0.939 0.907 0.818 0.827 0.882 0.768 0.877
AUC iDNA_MS [37] 0.962 0.984 0.780 0.900 0.761 0.780 0.909 0.935 0.785 0.956 0.975 0.950 0.926 0.868 0.926 0.821 0.925
iDNA_ABT [38] 0.955 0.976 0.856 0.902 0.753 0.799 0.918 0.943 0.798 0.942 0.955 0.941 0.859 0.871 0.928 0.836 0.926
iDNA_ABF [39] 0.969 0.986 0.878 0.928 0.728 0.748 0.932 0.936 0.811 0.960 0.979 0.964 0.889 0.903 0.941 0.804 0.945
BERT6mA [34] 0.956 0.975 0.799 0.903 0.742 0.805 0.915 0.962 0.777 0.950 0.962 0.947 0.865 0.850 0.938 0.838 0.925
Deep6mA [33] 0.953 0.974 0.886 0.926 0.759 0.814 0.933 0.945 0.798 0.968 0.972 0.964 0.888 0.884 0.944 0.814 0.949
MM-6mAPred [31] 0.939 0.978 0.886 0.844 0.755 0.735 0.834 0.831 0.708 0.892 0.954 0.901 0.853 0.821 0.843 0.771 0.828
StableDNAm 0.967 0.981 0.896 0.928 0.776 0.819 0.934 0.966 0.816 0.971 0.981 0.969 0.881 0.905 0.944 0.845 0.949
MCC iDNA_MS [37] 0.897 0.935 0.422 0.648 0.408 0.423 0.676 0.712 0.423 0.792 0.846 0.769 0.710 0.572 0.728 0.468 0.691
iDNA_ABT [38] 0.901 0.937 0.652 0.684 0.406 0.477 0.709 0.781 0.467 0.824 0.824 0.796 0.653 0.610 0.754 0.551 0.739
iDNA_ABF [39] 0.900 0.933 0.635 0.704 0.361 0.373 0.719 0.728 0.460 0.833 0.877 0.805 0.586 0.670 0.768 0.460 0.756
BERT6mA [34] 0.896 0.926 0.562 0.653 0.383 0.471 0.705 0.804 0.443 0.769 0.851 0.792 0.564 0.627 0.752 0.505 0.727
Deep6mA [33] 0.864 0.920 0.547 0.701 0.375 0.475 0.722 0.803 0.458 0.840 0.850 0.797 0.633 0.602 0.755 0.525 0.742
MM-6mAPred [31] 0.820 0.865 0.556 0.528 0.378 0.340 0.511 0.478 0.344 0.6202 0.720 0.646 0.573 0.491 0.596 0.427 0.506
StableDNAm 0.900 0.936 0.706 0.706 0.423 0.487 0.722 0.818 0.494 0.846 0.878 0.815 0.635 0.654 0.772 0.538 0.756

Bold indicates the optimal value among the compared methods, and underline indicates the suboptimal value