Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 6;81:209. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01220-1

Table 2.

The impact of informal caregiving on caregivers’ subjective well-being in the China family panel studies 2016, 2018,2020

Variables Subjective wellbeing
Ordered logit Fixed effects Ologit Mixed effects Ologit
Informal caregiving 0.887*** (0.027) 0.853** (0.070) 0.870*** (0.0270)
Age 0.994*** (0.001) 0.906** (0.045) 0.993*** (0.001)
Female 1.006 (0.033) N.A. 1.047 (0.034)
Married 1.545*** (0.037) 1.905*** (0.336) 1.582*** (0.037)
Urban 0.957 (0.028) 0.954 (0.189) 0.931 (0.028)
Medical insurance 1.094** (0.050) 1.186 (0.152) 1.117*** (0.045)
Secondary school 0.732*** (0.025) 0.643 (0.212) 0.739*** (0.033)
College and above 0.734*** (0.045) 0.416 (0.376) 0.794*** (0.043)
Working status 0.998 (0.041) 0.978 (0.136) 0.994 (0.046)
Log of income per capita 1.005 (0.004) 1.004 (0.012) 1.005 (0.004)
Chronic diseases 0.518*** (0.046) 0.742*** (0.093) 0.519*** (0.046)
Smoking 0.827*** (0.035) 0.660*** (0.105) 0.843*** (0.035)
Drinking 0.979 (0.071) 0.861 (0.110) 0.958 (0.069)
Living with parents 0.989 (0.072) 0.978 (0.227) 0.958 (0.069)
Having children 0.517 (0.715) 0.827 (0.961) 0.613 (0.439)
Household size 1.043*** (0.007) 1.074** (0.037) 1.029*** (0.007)
One of the parents still alive 0.965 (0.033) 0.883 (0.119) 0.951 (0.032)
Pseudo R2 0.021 0.029 -
Observations 19,264 19,264 19,264

Note: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1. Odds Ratio are reported and robust standard errors are in brackets. These models controlled for the dummy variables of year and province