Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 5;23:2426. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17373-1

Table 4.

Weighted logistic regression analysis on the association between CDAI and CHD

Non-adjusted model Model I Model II
OR [95% CI] P value OR [95% CI] P value OR [95% CI] P value
Continuous CDAI 0.94 (0.92,0.96)  < 0.001*** 0.93 (0.91,0.96)  < 0.001*** 0.95 (0.92,0.97)  < 0.001***
CDAI-Q1 Reference - Reference - Reference -
CDAI-Q2 0.93 (0.73,1.19) 0.55 0.83 (0.65,1.08) 0.16 0.89 (0.69,1.15) 0.37
CDAI-Q3 0.71 (0.57,0.88) 0.002** 0.63 (0.50,0.79)  < 0.001*** 0.67 (0.53,0.84)  < 0.001***
CDAI-Q4 0.59 (0.47,0.75)  < 0.001*** 0.58 (0.46,0.73)  < 0.001*** 0.65 (0.51,0.82)  < 0.001***

Data are presented as OR (95% CI). Model I adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Model II adjusted for age, sex, race, education levels, smoking, drinking, BMI, hypertension, DM, SBP, DBP, TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and eGFR

BMI body mass index, DM diabetes, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate

*** P value < 0.001, ** P value < 0.01, * P value < 0.05