Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 13;624(7990):92–101. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06723-z

Table 1.

Differences between current and potential carbon stocks for living tree biomass, dead wood and litter, soil (0–2 m depth) and total ecosystem carbon in different land-use types

Land-use types Living tree biomass Dead wood and litter Soil Total
Urban 1.1 (0.8–1.4) 0.3 (0.2–0.4) 0.3 (0.2–0.5) 1.7 (1.2–2.2)
Cropland 38.3 (25.5–50.7) 10.1 (6.7–13.3) 8.5 (5.4–12.6) 56.8 (37.5–76.6)
Pasture 29.8 (21.0–36.5) 7.6 (5.3–9.2) 6.0 (3.5–9.4) 43.3 (29.8–55.1)
Rangeland 24.6 (11.4–38.7) 6.1 (2.8–9.5) 3.1 (1.9–4.6) 33.7 (16.0–52.9)
Low-human-pressure land 37.0 (18.8–54.4) 12.2 (6.0–17.2) 4.2 (2.4–10.5) 53.3 (27.2–82.1)
Existing forest 84.7 (68.7–105.0) 26.9 (25.9–32.3) 27.3 (13.5–91.1) 138.9 (108.1–228.4)
Sum 216.7 (153.0–266.8) 61.8 (41.3–76.2) 49.3 (26.8–128.7) 327.8 (221.1–471.7)

Values show the means (in Gt C) of the four GS and six SD model predictions. Values in brackets show the full range of estimates across the ten models. For soil carbon, the uncertainty range (absolute errors) was based on ref. 23.