Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 7;10:132. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00702-z

Table 3.

PTS comparison between control and ACL injury groupsa

Control p-value of R vs L ACL injury p-value of R vs L p-value of C vs A
aPTS
 Right 9.0 ± 2.5 (2.5–14.1)  < .01 10.6 ± 3.0 (7.8–13.4)  < .01  < .01
 Left 10.5 ± 3.0 (2.4–19.3) 12.6 ± 2.9 (7.8–13.4)  < .01
 Side to side Difference 1.5 ± 2.3 (-3.5–7.3) 2.0 ± 2.7 (-4.9–10.3) NS
mPTS
 Right 6.6 ± 2.3 (1.5–12.2)  < .01 7.6 ± 2.6 (7.8–13.4)  < .01  < .01
 Left 8.1 ± 2.7 (0.2–16) 9.5 ± 2.6 (1.9–18)  < .01
 Side to side Difference 1.5 ± 2.4 (-4.3–9.8) 1.9 ± 2.5 (-4.5–9.7) NS
pPTS
 Right 4.0 ± 2.4 (-2–10.4)  < .01 5.9 ± 3.0 (7.8–13.4)  < .01  < .01
 Left 5.6 ± 2.8 (0.3–13.7) 8.0 ± 3.0 (7.8–13.4)  < .01
 Side to side Difference 1.5 ± 2.4 (-4.3–9.2) 2.0 ± 2.7 (-5.4–9.2) NS

Values in bold indicate stastical significance (P < .05)

PTS posterior tibial slope, aPTS anterior PTS, mPTS middle PTS, pPTS posterior PTS;, ACL anterior cruciate ligament, R right, L left, C control, A ACL, NS Not Significant

aData are expressed as mean ± SD (range)