Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 7;55(8):4099–4117. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02008-x

Table 3.

Performance in the stop signal task across experiments 1 and 2 as measured by the Race Model and kinematic method

Variable Variable label Staircase Exp. 1 (n = 23) Exp. 2 (n = 34)
Basic behavioral performance
Go errors (%) Omissions 0.1 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.5
Choice errors 0 ± 0 0.4 ± 0.8
Missed target 4.5 ± 3.5 3.9 ± 3.3
False alarms 1.6 ± 1.2 1.5 ± 2.0
Go response latency (ms) Reaction time 424 ± 53 468 ± 85
Total response time 836 ± 83 931 ± 122
Failed stop response latency (ms) Reaction time Home 397 ± 49 444 ± 77
Total response time Target 768 ± 83 857 ± 113
Stop signal delay (ms) SSD Home 103 ± 55 157 ± 109
SSD Target 500 ± 76 633 ± 134
Stop success (%) pStop Home 45 ± 6 45 ±6
pStop Target 49 ± 3 50 ± 3
Race Model analysis
Stopping latency (ms) SSRTRM Home 337 ± 54 329 ± 59
SSRTRM Target 338 ± 85 297 ± 65
Kinematic analysis
Stopping latency (ms) SSRTK (ms) Home 329 ± 63 327 ±56
SSRTK (ms) Target 334 ± 89 331 ±53
Variability of stopping latency (ms) SD-SSRTK (ms) Home 57 ± 19 64 ±25
SD-SSRTK (ms) Target 56 ± 22 67 ±27
Trigger failures (%) TFK Home 0.9 ±1.3 1.4 ±3.5

Key: pStop probability of stopping, SSD stop signal delay, SSRT stop signal reaction time, SD-SSRT standard deviation of stop signal reaction time, TF trigger failures