Table 2.
Criteria from the mixed methods appraisal tool.
| Title of the study | 1. Qualitative | 5. Mixed methods | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | |
| 1_ “Using the same hand”: The complex local perceptions of integrated one health-based intervention in East Africa | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | |||||
| 2_Evaluation of the feasibility and sustainability of the joint human and animal vaccination and its integration into the public health system in the Danamadji health district, Chad | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 3_ After-action review of rabies and anthrax outbreaks multisectoral response in Tanzania, challenges | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | ? | |||||
| 4_ Implementing One Health Concept in rural communities: approaches and Challenges in Sierra Leone | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | ? | |||||
| 5_ Practice of One Health Approaches: Bridges and Barriers in Tanzania | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 6_ Experiences of the one-health approach by the Uganda Trypanosomiasis Control Council and its secretariat in the control of zoonotic sleeping sickness in Uganda | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | ? | |||||
| 7_ Cross-Sectoral Zoonotic Disease Surveillance in Western Kenya: Identifying Drivers and Barriers Within a Resource-Constrained Setting | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 8_ Operationalizing the “One Health” approach in India: facilitators of and barriers to effective cross-sector convergence for zoonoses prevention and control | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 1 | |||||
| 9_ One Health: Past Successes and Future Challenges in Three African Contexts | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 10_ Toward integrated surveillance of zoonotic diseases in Burkina Faso: the case of anthrax | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||