Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 23;11:1252428. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252428

Table 4.

Different enablers factors found.

Facilitators summary
Governance and leadership
National (27, 28, 31, 34, 36)
Regional (32)
District (33)
_Existence of a reference framework document
_Existence of framework for reflection, orientation, and planning of health activities
_Political good willingness of One Health intervention
_Existence of the national One Health platform well-coordinated with multi-sectoral emergency response
_Existence of virtual and physical meetings conducted by a multisectoral platform
_Organization of joint and field simulation exercises to test the capacity for preparedness and response frameworks
_Coordination group for the response with all sectors
_Existence government leadership
_Formal governance and leadership structures
_High-level political backing
_Strong political commitment
_Existence of multisectoral and common objectives
_Strong political will
Collaborative networks
National (2730)
Regional (34)
District (33, 34)
_ Good coordination between the public health and veterinary services at the central and decentralized level
_Clear delineation of sectoral roles
_Developing clear operational guidelines and frameworks for cross-sectoral collaboration
_Energized communication between the Ministries of Health and Agriculture, awareness, and mutual professional respect
_ Motivation of stakeholders to engage in collaboration for the surveillance
_The culture of collaboration and collective interest
_The existence of a shared vision
_Trust based on respect and recognition
_ Good governance of intersectoral surveillance
_Existence of joint meeting that advocated ONE HEALTH approach with the implication of human, animal environmental sectors, and other institutions
_Existence of district health emergency response teams
_Coordination of the resource’s mobilization
Community engagement
National (27, 31)
Community level (27, 35)
_Implication of community
_Consideration of food, environmental, social needs, religious, and cultural aspects before the intervention
_ Orientation and education of people on good animal husbandry practices, the role and importance of the dog in providing security, and in the control of dog-associated rabies
_Ensure good working relationships between animal and crop farmers in the context of One Health
_Implication of anthropologist
_Identify the need of the target population
_Involvement in social mobilization
_The benefit gain: cost saving, health benefits, gain of time, many services at the same time, and efforts
_Knowledge and awareness of the importance of One Health intervention for the community
Surveillance and monitoring
National (29, 31, 36)
Regional (32)
Community (34)
_Identification of the diseases of interest for the implementation
_Presence of an effective data sharing system at all the level
_Knowledge of the epidemiological cycles of diseases, which demonstrate the link between human, animal, and environmental compartments
_Transfer of sample from health facility to zonal veterinary laboratory
Practices and experience (learning)
National level (29)
Regional (34)
District (33, 34)
_Good knowledge of surveillance actors about the One Health concept
_Good awareness of the importance of collaboration and multi-partner and ONE HEALTH approach to managing complex health problems
_Retooling courses concerning the OH approach
Resources
National (27, 28, 30, 31)
Regional (32, 34)
District (33)
Community (27)
_ Funder’s adherence to the approach and existence of financial support from donors
_Availability of personnel, resources, and fund
_Trained and enough personnel
_ Good resourcing considerations
_ Ongoing financial support to weather the inter-ministerial “turf wars.”
_ Mobilization of national budgets
_Availability of qualified vaccinators and supervisors (actors) at the local level
Communication
National (28, 36)
Regional (32, 33)
District (33, 34)
_Communication, information sharing
_Building a joint communication platform for data sharing on zoonoses based on existing human and animal disease reporting systems
_Leverage on past and ongoing collaborative mechanisms
_Existence of good formal and information communication
_Presence of formal channels of communication
_Efforts of communication between human and animal sectors when diseases occurred
_Good information exchange
_Awareness of the “One Health” concept among policymakers