Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 24;28:100641. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100641

Table 3.

Association between haemoglobin A1c and primary care providers' actions for hypoglycaemia prevention, stratified by the patient's hypoglycaemia history.

Haemoglobin A1c Categorya

<7.0% 7.0–7.9% 8.0–8.9% ≥9.0% Missing p-valueb
All patients, N = 242
 N 56 70 49 58 9
 PCP provided hypoglycaemia anticipatory guidance 11 (19.6) 13 (18.6) 11 (22.5) 13 (22.4) 2 (22.2) 0.99
 PCP de-intensified or adjusted a hypoglycaemia-causing medication 7 (12.5) 8 (11.4) 4 (8.2) 2 (3.5) 0 0.30
Patients reporting hypoglycemic event(s), n = 51
 N 12 13 9 14 3
 PCP provided hypoglycaemia anticipatory guidance 7 (58.3) 8 (61.5) 7 (77.8) 8 (57.1) 1 (33.3) 0.77
 PCP de-intensified or adjusted a hypoglycaemia-causing medication 5 (41.7) 5 (38.5) 3 (33.3) 2 (14.3) 0 0.48
Patients reporting no hypoglycemic events, n = 27
 N 5 11 6 5 0
 PCP provided hypoglycaemia anticipatory guidance 2 (40.0) 2 (18.2) 2 (33.3) 1 (20.0) 0 0.78
 PCP de-intensified or adjusted a hypoglycaemia-causing medication 1 (20.0) 1 (9.1) 1 (16.7) 0 0 0.81
Hypoglycaemia history not discussed, n = 164
 N 39 46 34 39 6
 PCP provided hypoglycaemia anticipatory guidance 2 (5.1) 3 (6.5) 2 (5.9) 4 (10.3) 1 (16.7) 0.83
 PCP de-intensified or adjusted a hypoglycaemia-causing medication 1 (2.6) 2 (4.4) 0 0 0 0.69

Data are n (% of column) unless otherwise indicated.

a

Most recent value within the past 12 months prior to clinic visit.

b

Association between the five HbA1c categories as a nominal variable and the listed PCP action by logistic regression adjusted for insulin use with variance accounting clustering by PCP.