Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 7;19:261. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03823-w

Table 5.

Mean (SEM) TMABc (total mesophilic aerobic bacteria counts) and Enterobacteriaceae counts expressed as Log10 CFU/cm2 and p-values for comparisons between feed type, cleaning method and bowl material pairwise interactions

n % TMABc
[Log10CFU/cm2]
p-value Enterobacteriaceae
[Log10CFU/cm2]
p-value
Food type & cleaning method Dry food & dry wiping 26 29 1.02 (0.25) 0.3270 -1.06 (0.25) 0.6331
Dry food & hand washing 20 22 1.81 (0.29) -0.48 (0.29)
Wet food & dry wiping 25 27 1.87 (0.26) -0.82 (0.26)
Wet food & hand washing 20 22 2.11 (0.29) -0.50 (0.29)
Food type & bowl material Dry food & plastic 22 24 0.98 (0.28) 0.7875 -1.10 (0.28) 0.7163
Dry food & metal 24 26 1.85 (0.26) -0.44 (0.26)
Wet food & plastic 24 26 1.48 (0.26) -0.87 (0.27)
Wet food & metal 21 23 2.49 (0.28) -0.46 (0.28)
Cleaning method & bowl material Dry wiping & plastic 25 28 1.23 (0.24) 0.0646 -1.13 (0.24) 0.6094
Dry wiping & metal 23 25 1.67 (0.27) -0.74 (0.27)
Hand washing & plastic 21 23 1.23 (0.30) -0.83 (0.31)
Hand washing & metal 22 24 2.68 (0.27) -0.15 (0.28)

Statistical significance: p ≤ 0.05