Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 23;5:1254929. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1254929

Table 5.

Changes in primary and secondary outcomes from baseline to the 4-week follow-up between overall engagement profiles.

Outcomes Average engagement profile (n = 104) High engagement profile (n = 31) Modeling differences by engagement profileb
Baseline (n = 104), mean (SD) Follow-up (n = 91), mean (SD) t test (df) P valuea Baseline (n = 31), mean (SD) Follow-up, (n = 31), mean (SD) t test (df) P valuea Cohen d Coefficients P-value
Primary outcomes (Stress appraisals)
Challenge 3.25 (0.77) 3.53 (0.79) 3.24 (90) 0.002 3.46 (0.74) 3.98 (0.95) 3.50 (30) 0.002 0.253 0.344 0.034
Threat 4.01 (0.69) 3.92 (0.68) −1.70 (90) 0.093 3.91 (0.84) 3.61 (0.97) −2.32 (30) 0.027 −0.308 −0.231 0.057
Resource 3.50 (0.98) 3.77 (0.94) 2.66 (90) 0.009 3.33 (0.98) 3.99 (0.87) 4.23 (3) <.001 0.412 0.294 0.086
a

Paired t test.

b

The effect of engagement profile (average engagement vs. high engagement) on the outcome at follow-up controlling for outcome at baseline.