Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1998 Feb;32(6):775–803.

An organizational field approach to resource environments in healthcare: comparing entries of hospitals and home health agencies in the San Francisco Bay region.

M Ruef 1, P Mendel 1, W R Scott 1
PMCID: PMC1070233  PMID: 9460486

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To draw together insights from three perspectives (health economics, organizational ecology, and institutional theory) in order to clarify the factors that influence entries of providers into healthcare markets. A model centered on the concept of an organizational field is advanced as the level of analysis best suited to examining the assortment and interdependence of organizational populations and the institutional forces that shape this co-evolution. In particular, the model argues that: (1) different populations of healthcare providers partition fiscal, geographic, and demographic resource environments in order to ameliorate competition and introduce service complementarities; and (2) competitive barriers to entry within populations of providers vary systematically with regulatory regimens. DATA SOURCES: County-level entries of hospitals and home health agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area using data from the American Hospital Association (1945-1991) and California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (1976-1991). Characteristics of the resource environment are derived from the Area Resource File (ARF) and selected government censuses. METHODS OF ANALYSIS: A comparative design is applied to contrast influences on hospital and home health agency entries during the post-World War II period. Empirical estimates are obtained using Poisson and negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: Hospital and HHA markets are partitioned primarily by the age and education of consumers and, to a lesser extent, by urbanization levels and public funding expenditures. Such resource partitioning allows independent HHAs to exist comfortably in concentrated hospital markets. For both hospitals and HHAs, the barriers to entry once generated by oligopolistic concentration have declined noticeably with the market-oriented reforms of the past 15 years. CONCLUSION: A field-level perspective demonstrates that characteristics of local resource environments interact with interdependencies of provider populations and broader regulatory regimes to affect significantly the types of provider organizations likely to enter a given healthcare market.

Full text

PDF
775

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander J. A., Amburgey T. L. The dynamics of change in the American hospital industry: transformation or selection? Med Care Rev. 1987 Fall;44(2):279–321. doi: 10.1177/107755878704400205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander J. A., Anderson J. G., Lewis B. L. Toward an empirical classification of hospitals in multihospital systems. Med Care. 1985 Jul;23(7):913–932. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198507000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander J. A., Kaluzny A. D., Middleton S. C. Organizational growth, survival and death in the U.S. hospital industry: a population ecology perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(3):303–308. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergthold L. Crabs in a bucket: the politics of health care reform in California. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1984 Summer;9(2):203–222. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9-2-203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown E. R., Cousineau M. R. Effectiveness of state mandates to maintain local government health services for the poor. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1984 Summer;9(2):223–236. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9-2-223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dranove D., White W. D., Wu L. Segmentation in local hospital markets. Med Care. 1993 Jan;31(1):52–64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199301000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Estes C. L., Swan J. H., Bergthold L. A., Spohn P. H. Running as fast as they can: organizational changes in home health care. Home Health Care Serv Q. 1992;13(1-2):35–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldman R., Wholey D., Christianson J. Economic and organizational determinants of HMO mergers and failures. Inquiry. 1996 Summer;33(2):118–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fuchs V. R. The growing demand for medical care. N Engl J Med. 1968 Jul 25;279(4):190–195. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196807252790405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gamm L. D. Health care markets as interorganizational fields: a conceptual perspective. Health Serv Manage Res. 1992 Mar;5(1):44–53. doi: 10.1177/095148489200500105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gillies R. R., Shortell S. M., Anderson D. A., Mitchell J. B., Morgan K. L. Conceptualizing and measuring integration: findings from the health systems integration study. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993 Winter;38(4):467–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hulka B. S., Wheat J. R. Patterns of utilization. The patient perspective. Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):438–460. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198505000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lamont B. T., Marlin D., Hoffman J. J. Porter's generic strategies, discontinuous environments, and performance: a longitudinal study of changing strategies in the hospital industry. Health Serv Res. 1993 Dec;28(5):623–640. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Payton S., Powsner R. M. Regulation through the looking glass: hospitals, Blue Cross, and certificate-of-need. Mich Law Rev. 1980 Dec;79(2):203–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Robinson J. C. The changing boundaries of the American hospital. Milbank Q. 1994;72(2):259–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scalzi C. C., Zinn J. S., Guilfoyle M. J., Perdue S. T. Medicare-certified home health services: national and regional supply in the 1980s. Am J Public Health. 1994 Oct;84(10):1646–1648. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.10.1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott W. R. The organization of medical care services: toward an integrated theoretical model. Med Care Rev. 1993 Fall;50(3):271–303. doi: 10.1177/002570879305000303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spohn P. H., Bergthold L., Estes C. L. From cottages to condos: the expansion of the home health care industry under Medicare. Home Health Care Serv Q. 1987;8(4):25–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Starkweather D. B. Competition, integration, and diversification: seven hospitals of Growthville, U.S.A. J Health Adm Educ. 1990 Fall;8(4):519–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Welch W. P. HMO enrollment: a study of market forces and regulations. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1984 Winter;8(4):743–758. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8-4-743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wholey D. R., Sanchez S. M. The effects of regulatory tools on organizational populations. Acad Manage Rev. 1991 Oct;16(4):743–767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES