Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 22;1(2):86–104. doi: 10.1016/j.eehl.2022.05.001

Table 2.

Summary of representative waste-derived photocatalysts for pollutant degradation.

Photocatalyst Pollutant Photodegradation conditions
Degradation efficiency (%)
P.A.a (g/L) C0 (mg/L) Irradiation Time (h) pH
Cotton waste-derived carbon microtube BPAb 0.5 10 Visible light 2 ∼95 [173]
Industrial waste-derived TiO2/Fe2O3 Methyl blue 1 79.9 Natural sunlight 2 5 100 [174]
RhB 1 47.9 Natural sunlight 2 5 93 [174]
Congo red 1 69.67 Natural sunlight 2 5 99 [174]
Waste toner powder-derived g-C3N4-Fe2O3 MO 1 20 Natural sunlight 1.5 99 [175]
Spent batteries-derived graphene oxide/copper composite MB 0.5 100 UV lightc 3 90 [176]
Industrial waste-derived multiphase photocatalysts Ritonavir 0.4 10 Visible light 0.25 95 [177]
Lopinavir 0.4 10 Visible light 1 95 [177]
ZnO immobilized onto wood waste-derived AC MB 3 10–50 Visible light 3 8 100 [178]
Cd2+-loaded spent adsorbent MB 0.4 20 Visible light 0.33 97.41 [179]
Pb2+-loaded spent adsorbent Acetaminophen 0.2 5 Visible light 3 7 93 [180]
Polystyrene waste supported Ag-TiO2 MB 6.7 45 UV light 2.5 6 60 [181]
Cr(VI) 6.7 15 UV light 2.5 2 32 [181]
Red mud modified montmorillonite Phenol 1 100 Visible light 1 6 95 [67]
Cr(VI) 1 60 Visible light 2 4 97 [67]
a

Photocatalyst amount.

b

Bisphenol A.

c

Ultraviolet light.