Table 3.
Comparison of different CO2 reduction technologies.
Type | Energy | Temperature | Advantage | Challenge |
---|---|---|---|---|
Photochemical CO2 reduction | Photon | Ambient temperature | Environment-friendly; Energy conservation; Simple operability. | Low photon efficiency; Low product selectivity and reaction rate; Expensive catalysts; Low stability of the catalyst. |
Electrochemical CO2 reduction | Electricity | Ambient temperature | Environment-friendly; Mild operating conditions; Good product adjustability; Rich product types. | High overpotential; Low solubility of CO2 in aqueous solutions; Liquid product mixed with electrolyte; Low Faradaic efficiencies, current densities, and high energy consumption; Low stability of the catalyst. |
Thermochemical CO2 reduction | Heat | 500–1000 °C | High-value product; Efficient selectivity; Large scale. | High energy consumption, high-temperature, and high-pressure conditions. |