Table 5. Routing tables for select the best route between node 1 and node 10.
| Nodes | Neighbors | Accumulated delay | Accumulated service cost | Best routes with Skyline | Ranking routes with Euclidean distance | Best parent | Second parent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 1–2 | 1–2 | 1 | 2 5 |
| 3 | 9 | 12 | |||||
| 4 | 18 | 37 | |||||
| 5 | 15 | 24 | |||||
| 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1–3 2-3 |
1–3 2-3 |
1 | 2 5 |
| 2 | 5 | 12 | |||||
| 5 | 9 | 24 | |||||
| 6 | 24 | 9 | |||||
| 4 | 2 | 10 | 28 | 2–4 | 2–4 | 2 | 7 |
| 7 | 13 | 38 | |||||
| 8 | 17 | 48 | |||||
| 5 | 2 | 9 | 23 | 3–5 | 3–5 | 3 | 2 5 |
| 3 | 8 | 15 | |||||
| 6 | 23 | 20 | |||||
| 7 | 16 | 33 | |||||
| 9 | 10 | 29 | |||||
| 6 | 3 | 15 | 8 | 3–6 9-6 |
3–6 9-6 |
3 | 9 5 |
| 5 | 16 | 20 | |||||
| 9 | 14 | 22 | |||||
| 7 | 4 | 11 | 34 | 4–7 5-7 |
5–7 4-7 |
5 | 4 |
| 5 | 12 | 21 | |||||
| 8 | 16 | 37 | |||||
| 8 | 4 | 13 | 38 | 4–8 7–8 9–8 |
7–8 9–8 4–8 |
7 | 9 4 |
| 7 | 14 | 31 | |||||
| 9 | 18 | 27 | |||||
| 9 | 5 | 9 | 17 | 5–9 6–9 |
5–9 6–9 |
5 | 6 |
| 6 | 20 | 10 | |||||
| 8 | 23 | 33 | |||||
| 10 | 8 | 20 | 36 | 9–10 | 9–10 | 9 | 8 |
| 9 | 13 | 22 |