Table 3. Comparison of network performance on three datasets.
| Model | Flops (G) | Imagewoof | The Oxford-IIIT pet | 102 Category flower | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top-1 Acc | Top-5 Acc | Top-1 Acc | Top-5 Acc | Top-1 Acc | Top-5 Acc | ||
| PVTv2_B1 | 2.1 | 85.4% | 97.5% | 79.7% | 93.5% | 95.6% | 98.7% |
| Swinv1_Tiny | 4.5 | 78.8% | 97.7% | 70.7% | 93.7% | 94.1% | 98.4% |
| CMT_S | 4.0 | 79.7% | 96.7% | 59.0% | 82.3% | 74.9% | 87.5% |
| MViTv2_Tiny | 4.7 | 85.6% | 97.2% | 83.2% | 96.0% | 95.3% | 98.9% |
| Swinv2_Tiny | 6.6 | 75.8% | 97.6% | 66.4% | 91.2% | 91.1% | 97.6% |
| Ours | 5.7 | 87.6% | 98.7% | 82.6% | 96.8% | 95.4% | 98.8% |
Note:
The results of the model presented in this article are shown in bold.