Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 27;9:e1580. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1580

Table 4. Performance of 3 models with and without SMOTE.

Model Evaluation KDDCup99 CICIDS 2017 UNSW_NB15
Without SMOTE With SMOTE Without SMOTE With SMOTE Without SMOTE With SMOTE
LightGBM accuracy 0.878 0.977 0.653 0.996 0.845 0.893
Precision 0.920 0.975 0.721 0.996 0.857 0.899
Recall 0.878 0.977 0.653 0.996 0.845 0.893
F1-Score 0.887 0.976 0.657 0.996 0.850 0.895
XGBoost accuracy 0.878 0.999 0.998 0.995 0.899 0.893
Precision 0.920 0.999 0.998 0.995 0.901 0.901
Recall 0.878 0.999 0.998 0.995 0.899 0.893
F1-Score 0.887 0.999 0.998 0.994 0.897 0.896
CatBoost accuracy 1.000 0.999 0.997 0.996 0.892 0.887
Precision 1.000 0.999 0.997 0.996 0.893 0.889
Recall 1.000 0.999 0.997 0.996 0.892 0.887
F1-Score 1.000 0.999 0.997 0.996 0.888 0.887