. 2023 Oct 24;9:e1639. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1639

Table 5. Comparisons of $F_{1}$ scores: AraGEC framework vs existing approaches on two benchmarks, bold highlighting the highest scores.

Models	2014	2015
CLMB-1 Rozovskaya et al. (2014)	67.91	N/A
SCUT Solyman et al. (2021)	N/A	70.91
CUFE Nawar (2015)	N/A	72.87
AHMADI Sina (2017)	50.34	N/A
WATSON Watson, Zalmout & Habash (2018)	70.39	73.19
PAJAK Pajak & Pajak (2022)	N/A	69.81
BKDGEC (Our model)	71.51	74.03

Table 5. Comparisons of F1 scores: AraGEC framework vs existing approaches on two benchmarks, bold highlighting the highest scores.