Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 30;2023:4779409. doi: 10.1155/2023/4779409

Table 3.

Analysis of factors affecting metastatic status of lymph nodes.

Variables Nonmetastatic nodes Metastatic nodes Univariate analysis
n = 208 n = 138 OR (95%) p
Age
 <29 34 (16.3) 37 (26.8) 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 0.02
 ≥29 174 (83.7) 101 (73.2)
Gender
 Male 7 (3.4) 7 (5.1) 0.6 (0.2–1.9) 0.6
 Female 201 (96.6) 131 (94.9)
Graves' disease
 No 2 (1) 2 (1.4) 0.7 (0.1–4.7) 0.7
 Yes 206 (99) 136 (98.6)
Tumor diameter on US (mm) 7.1 ± 3.3 (2.6–20) 8.5 ± 0.3 (2.7–20) 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.00
Tumor location
 Single lobe 200 (96.2) 129 (93.5) 1.7 (0.7–4.6) 0.3
 Both lobes/isthmus 8 (3.8) 9 (6.5)
Surgical procedure
 Total thyroidectomy 28 (13.5) 27 (19.6) 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 0.1
 Conservative thyroidectomy 180 (86.5) 111 (80.4)
Central neck dissection
 Both sides 24 (11.5) 24 (17.4) 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 0.12
 One side 184 (88.5) 114 (28.6)
Tumor classification
 T1a 169 (81.2) 98 (71) 1.8 (1.1–2.9) 0.03
 ≥T1b 39 (18.8) 40 (29)
Microscopic capsular invasion
 No 153 (73.6) 103 (74.6) 0.9 (0.6–1.5) 0.82
 Yes 55 (26.4) 35 (25.4)
Thyroiditis
 No 168 (80.8) 117 (84.8) 0.8 (0.4–1.3) 0.3
 Yes 40 (19.2) 21 (15.2)