. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2023 Jun 8;50(11):6864–6880. doi: 10.1002/mp.16548

Table 3.

The 3D Gamma passing rates between the dose distributions calculated on $i C T$ and the corresponding $s C T s$ of the 10 testing patients with a threshold of 3%/3mm/10% and 2%/2mm/10% for both the wMAE model and the M+S model, respectively.

PATIENT	3%/3mm/10% (wMAE) / (M+S)	2%/2mm/10% (wMAE) / (M+S)

#1	0.999 / 0.998	0.997 / 0.996
#2 ^*	0.996 / 0.965	0.98 / 0.926
#3	1.0 / 0.991	0.999 / 0.977
#4	1.0 / 0.999	0.999 / 0.999
#5	0.995 / 0.943	0.978 / 0.913
#6 ^*	0.966 / 0.976	0.921 / 0.934
#7	1.0 / 0.979	1.0 / 0.970
#8	1.0 / 0.979	1.0 / 0.970
#9	0.999 / 0.924	0.991 / 0.811
#10 ^*	0.921 / 0.924	0.899 / 0.902
Average	0.986±0.026 / 0.963±0.029	0.977±0.036 / 0.945±0.062
Average(photon)	0.995±0.012 / 0.974±0.029	0.987±0.029 / 0.955±0.067
Average(proton)	0.971±0.043 / 0.944±0.020	0.953±0.047 / 0.907±0.007

indicates that the patient was treated with proton therapy.