Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 23;14:1282386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1282386

Table 2.

Cross-referencing the questions chosen.

Question Literature review
Give the marks on the five-point (1–5) active engagement scale. Active engagement entails a high level of involvement and a profound understanding and expertise in various activities (Starr-Glass, 2020; Ladino Nocua et al., 2021).
(2) Does DL provide a good experience and participation for you on sustainability science education? experience and participation were performed on some affective and interaction parameters derived from the answers of a semi-structured survey (Capone and Lepore, 2021).
(3) What influences students’ participation with educators? Students’ levels of participation in DL, distinguishing between different analyses deploying varied theoretical frameworks, including sociology, social psychology studies in science major (Henriksen, 2015; Park, 2014).
(4) Is it easier for the respondent to achieve high marks in DL? Studies indicated that students reported significantly higher scores in DL and DL may obtain better results (Arbaugh and Benbunan-Finch, 2006).
(5) What suggestions do you have for the future development of DL in sustainability science education? Distance learning is an opportunity to enhance continuing professional development in sustainability science (Southernwood, 2008; Henriksen, 2015).