TABLE 3.
Simulation Posterior Summaries for Partially-Missing Within-Study Correlations: MCAR/MNAR Missingness
| Missing Data Mechanism: MCAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Missing, Non-Missing Average rj Discrepancy = 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mean Impute (d) | Informative Uniform Prior (e) | Conservative Hierarchical Beta Prior (g) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| β Bias | CVG* | CVG | σe Bias | β Bias | CVG* | CVG | σe Bias | β Bias | CVG* | CVG | σe Bias | |||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PM=0.2 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 |
| PM=0.5 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.96 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 |
| PM=0.8 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 | −0.13 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.95 | −0.01 | 0.00 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Missing Data Mechanism: MNAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Missing, Non-Missing Average rj Discrepancy = 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mean Impute (d) | Informative Uniform Prior (e) | Conservative Hierarchical Beta Prior (g) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| β Bias | CVG* | CVG | σe Bias | β Bias | CVG* | CVG | σe Bias | β Bias | CVG* | CVG | σe Bias | |||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | Setup 2 | Setup 3 | |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PM=0.2 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.96 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.96 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.00 |
| PM=0.5 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.96 | −0.03 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.95 | −0.03 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.96 | −0.03 | 0.00 |
| PM=0.8 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.86 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.96 | −0.05 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.96 | −0.05 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.95 | −0.03 | 0.00 |
PM: Proportion Missing; Setup 2: Average SEs equivalent to between-study SDs. Setup 3: Average SEs one-tenth the size of between-study SDs. Letters (e.g. (d)) displayed correspond to those used to define missing data handling strategies introduced in-text.