TABLE 3.

Linear and logistic regression models of associations of cannabis marketing exposure with attitudes and use behavior in the full sample.

Variable	Positive attitudes about cannabis usea				Interest in obtaining a medical cannabis licenseb				Cannabis harm perceptions (no/a little vs. some/a lot)a AOR (95% CI)	Past 30-day cannabis usec AOR (95% CI)
	b	SE	β	P	b	SE	β	P
Any source of marketing
No	Ref				Ref				Ref	Ref
Yes	0.18	0.03	.07	<.0001	0.26	0.04	.08	<.0001	1.15 (0.99,1.34)	2.65 (2.27, 3.10)
Number of marketing sources	0.09	0.01	.11	<.0001	0.10	0.01	.10	<.0001	1.05 (1.00, 1.10)	1.30 (1.25, 1.36)
Specific sources of cannabis marketing exposure d
Outdoor marketing
No	Ref				Ref				Ref	Ref
Yes	0.12	0.03	.05	<.001	0.05	0.04	.02	.24	1.34 (1.14, 1.56)	1.38 (1.19, 1.60)
Social media marketing
No
Yes	0.15	0.03	.07	<.001	0.23	0.05	.08	<.001	1.22 (1.03, 1.44)	1.83 (1.58, 2.12)
Print marketing
No
Yes	−0.07	0.03	−.03	.03	0.00	0.05	.00	.98	0.72 (0.61, 0.85)	1.10 (0.96, 1.28)
Internet marketing
No
Yes	0.09	0.03	.04	<.001	0.12	0.05	.04	.01	1.02 (0.86, 1.21)	1.04 (0.89, 1.21)

Note: Bolded text indicates significance for AOR (p < .05). Cannabis harm perceptions coded as 1 = no/a little and 0 = some/a lot. Abbreviations: b, unstandardized beta; β, standardized beta.

^aModel included age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, health insurance, employment status, past 30-day cannabis use, and possession of medical cannabis license as covariates.

^bExamined only among respondents without a medical cannabis license. Model included age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, health insurance, employment status, and past 30-day cannabis use as covariates.

^cModel included age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, health insurance, and employment status as covariates.

^dCannabis marketing sources were analyzed in the same model.