Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb 9;250:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.02.002

Table 3.

Estimated average annual change in static perimetry measures

Outcomes Entire cohort (N=102) a ------------Preserved visual field cohort b -----------
All (N=88) False positives <15% (N=80) c Outliers down-weighted (N=88) d
VTOT (dB-sr/year)
 Annual Change e −2.05 −2.25 −2.27 −2.03
 95% CI (−2.70, −1.40) (−2.96, −1.54) (−2.92, −1.62) (−2.57, −1.49)
V30 (dB-sr/year)
 Annual Change e −0.48 −0.56 −0.52 −0.52
 95% CI (−0.65, −0.32) (−0.73, −0.40) (−0.67, −0.37) (−0.65, −0.38)
VPERIPH (dB-sr/year)
 Annual Change e −1.53 −1.68 −1.75 −1.56
 95% CI (−2.08, −0.97) (−2.29, −1.07) (−2.31, −1.18) (−2.02, −1.10)
Mean Sensitivity (dB/year)
 Annual Change e −0.55 −0.60 −0.58 −0.54
 95% CI (−0.71, −0.40) (−0.77, −0.43) (−0.73, −0.43) (−0.67, −0.41)
a

Number of missing data: VTOT (4), VPERIPH (4), mean sensitivity (4)

b

Include participants with baseline VTOT >5 dB-sr

c

Tests with false positive rate <15%

d

Outliers were down-weighted using weighted mixed-effects model, weights were computed from robust regression modelling of estimate rate of decline from each participant

e

All P-values for testing the average annual change estimates against zero were <0.001