Table 1.
Study (Ref.) | Design | Treatment | Population | Nr. | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shepherd FA. et al. [13] | Prospective Randomized | Docetaxel vs. BSC | Progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy | 104 | PFS 10.6 vs. 6.7 weeks OS 7.0 vs. 4.6 months |
Schuette W. et al. [14] | Phase III | Docetaxel w. vs. 3 weekly |
Progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy | 215 | OS 6.3 vs. 9.2 months ORR 10.5% vs. 12.6% |
Crinò L. et al. [15] | Phase II | Gemcitabine | stage IIIB or IV | 83 | mDoR 29 weeks |
Yoneshima Y et al. [17] | Non inferiority Phase III |
Nab-paclitaxel vs. Docetaxel | Progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy | 503 | OS 16.2 vs. 13.6 months PFS 4.2 vs. 3.4 months ORR 29.9% vs. 15.4% |
Hanna N, et al. [18] | Non inferiority Phase III |
Pemetrexed vs Docetaxel | Progressed on first-line chemotherapy | 571 | PFS 2.9 vs 2.9 months OS 8.3 vs 7.9 months |
Nokihara H, et al. [19] | Non inferiority Phase III |
S-1 vs. Docetaxel | Progressed on at least first-line platinum-based chemotherapy | 1154 | PFS 2.86 vs. 2.89 months OS 12.75 vs. 12.52 months |
LUME-Lung 1 Reck M. et al. [28] |
Phase III | Docetaxel ± Nintedanib |
Progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy Adenocarcinomas |
655 | PFS 3.4 vs. 2.7 months OS 10.1 vs. 9.1 months OS 12.6 vs. 10.3 months |
VARGADO Grohè C. et al. [29] |
Prospective no interventional | Nintedanib + Docetaxel |
Previously treated with chemotherapy-IO (cohort C) | 135 | DCR 72.5% PFS 4.8 months |
REVEL Garon EB. [30] |
Phase III | Ramucirumab ± Docetaxel | Progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy | 1825 | PFS 4.5 vs. 3 months OS 10.5 vs. 9.1 months |
ULTIMATE Cortot AB. et al. [32] |
Phase III | Paclitaxel weekly vs. Docetaxel | Previously treated with 1 or 2 prior lines | 166 | PFS 5.4 vs. 3.9 months ORR 22.5% vs. 5.5% OS 9.9 vs. 10.8 |
DCR = Disease Control Rate; ORR = Overall Response Rate; OS = Overall Survival; PFS = Progression Free Survival; mDoR = median duration of response.