Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 22;12(23):7230. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237230

Table 1.

RAGT concise overview of the chosen papers’ key characteristics and bias risk.

Author, Year Country Total Sample (TS) Study Design Intervention Outcome Level of Injury NOS
Hornby 2005 [22] USA 30 RCT The utilization of robotic assistance in BWSTT and therapist-assisted BWSTT. The intervention involved engaging in overground ambulation via a mobile suspension device for three 30 min weekly sessions over 8 weeks. LEMS, 6MWT AIS B, C, and D. The level of damage is located above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10). -
Wirz 2005 [23] USA 20 Single group The Lokomat (DGO) intervention consisted of an 8 week duration, with participants attending three to five sessions per week, each lasting 45 min. AS, LEMS, 6MWT, 10MWT, and TUG AIS C and D. The level of injury is at L1 or above. 7
Field 2011 [24] USA 64 RCT The participants engaged in a training regimen for 12 weeks, with a frequency of 5 days per week. The training program encompassed four distinct modalities, namely treadmill-based training with manual help (TM), treadmill-based training with stimulation (TS), overground training with motivation (OG), and treadmill-based training with robotic assistance (LR). LEMS AIS C and D. The level of damage is located at or above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10). -
Alcobendas 2012 [25] Spain 75 RCT The study consisted of a total of 40 sessions conducted over 8 weeks. Each session lasted for approximately 1 h and involved a Lokomat group intervention. Specifically, participants spent 30 min utilizing the Lokomat device within each session, followed by an additional 30 min of normal physical treatment. The overground group implemented a standardized biological treatment protocol for one hour. VAS, LEMS, 6MWT, and 10MWT AIS C and D. The range of injuries observed in the individual spans from the second cervical vertebra (C2) to the twelfth thoracic vertebra (T12). -
Aach 2014 [26] Germany 8 Pre-post experimental design HAL had been used for 90 days, with a frequency of five weekly sessions. LEMS, 6MWT, 10MWT, and TUG ASIA A. Degree of damage: T8 to L2 7
del-Ama 2014 [27] Switzerland 3 Pilot study The Kinesis system was implemented during the first week, whereas no intervention was delivered the following week. AS, VAS, 6MWT, and 10MWT AIS A and D. Injuries impact the spinal levels encompassing L1 and L2. 8
Labruyère 2014 [28] Switzerland 9 RCT The first group underwent 16 sessions of RAGT using the Lokomat device, followed by an additional 16 strength training sessions. Group 2 received the intervention in reverse order. VAS, LEMS, and 10MWT AIS C and D. The extent of the injury ranges from the fourth cervical vertebra (C4) to the eleventh thoracic vertebra (T11). -
Niu 2014 [29] USA 40 RCT The experimental group underwent twelve 1 h Lokomat training sessions over one month, whereas the control group did not receive any interventions. TUG AIS B, C, and D. The level of damage is located above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10). -
Shin 2014 [30] South Korea 53 RCT In four weeks, the RAGT group received three 40 min sessions per week of RAGT in addition to regular physiotherapy. The conventional group received physiotherapy twice daily, five days per week. LEMS AIS D. The level of injury is classified as upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement. -
Varoqui 2014 [31] USA 30 RCT The Lokomat group participated in three weekly sessions for four weeks, each lasting one hour. The control group, on the other hand, did not receive any intervention. 6MWT, 10MWT, TUG AIS C and D. The level of damage is located above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10). -
Duffell 2015 [32] USA 56 RCT The study involved allocating participants with an incomplete SCI into three groups: a control group receiving no intervention, a group receiving Lokomat intervention, and a group receiving tizanidine intervention. TUG AIS C and D The level of damage is located above the tenth thoracic vertebra (T10). -
Lam 2015 [33] Canada 15 RCT The Lokomat-assisted BWSTT intervention was conducted for 45 min, three times a week, for three months. 6MWT, 10MWT AIS C and D. Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals with lower motoneuron damage or lesion levels than T11. -
Stampacchia 2016 [34] Italy 21 Single group The robotic exoskeleton (Ekso GT) exercise lasted approximately 40 min. MAS, VAS AIS A, B, and D. The observed lesions were located at the low cervical level (C7), dorsal level, and high lumbar level (L1–L2). 7
Mazzoleni 2017 [35] Italy 7 Single group The study consisted of 20 sessions, with a frequency of three sessions per week. The first set of sessions utilized a FES cycling system called Pegaso. It was followed by another group of 20 sessions, again with a frequency of three sessions per week, where participants used an overground robotic exoskeleton called the Ekso GT. MAS, VAS, 6MWT, 10MWT, and TUG AIS A. Injury severity: T4–T12 7
Watanabe 2019 [36] Japan 2 Case report HAL has been used 3–4 times weekly for eight sessions. It is performed with regular physical therapy, each lasting approximately 20–30 min. MAS, LEMS AIS C and D Injury severity: T8–T10, L1 7
Wirz 2017 [37] USA 21 RCT The intervention group received a training duration of 50 min per session, while the control group had a training duration of 25 min per session using the Lokomat device. Both groups underwent training sessions 3–5 days per week for a total period of 8 weeks. 10MWT AIS B and C. C4 to T12 are affected. -

AS: Ashworth Scale; MAS: Modified Ashworth Scale; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; 6MWT: 6 Minute Walk Test; 10MWT: 10 Meter Walking Test; LEMS: Lower Extremity Motor Score; TUG: Timed Up And Go Test; BWSTT: Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training; HAL: Hybrid Assistive Limb; FES: Functional Electrical Stimulation; AIS: ASIA Impairment Scale; SCI: Spinal Cord Injury; NOS: Newcastle Ottawa Scale.