Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 29;12(23):7391. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237391

Table A2.

Subgroup analysis with line of work added to the final logistic regression model for work ability 12 months after rehabilitation, n = 1118.

OR (95% CI) p-Value
Independent variable
Age
   18–39 years a 1.0
   40–49 years 1.49 (0.86, 2.57) 0.16
   50–59 years 2.18 (1.31, 3.65) 0.003
   60–66 years 1.74 (0.93, 3.26) 0.08
Diagnosis
   Other a 1.0
   Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases 1.11 (0.73, 1.67) 0.62
   Cancer 0.26 (0.15, 0.56) <0.001
Comorbidities
   None a 1.0
   1–2 0.49 (0.27, 0.89) 0.02
   3–4 0.40 (0.22, 0.75) 0.004
   5 or more 0.25 (0.11, 0.60) 0.002
Pain intensity
   0–5 a 1.0
   6–7 0.56 (0.38, 0.83) 0.004
   8–10 0.72 (0.42, 1.23) 0.23
EQ-5D VAS
   0–39 a 1.0
   40–55 2.01 (1.29, 3.14) 0.002
   56–100 3.72 (2.38, 5.82) <0.001
Marital status
   Single a 1.0
   Married/cohabiting 0.59 (0.41, 0.86) 0.005
Main line of work
   Manager and professional a 1.0
   Technician or associate professional 0.93 (0.56, 1.57) 0.79
   Service-, sales- or care-worker; craft and related trades worker; or machine operator 0.59 (0.37, 0.93) 0.03
   Work training or apprentice, elementary occupations and other 0.83 (0.51, 1.37) 0.48

Work ability score (WAS) as dependent variable, dichotomized into low/moderate and good/excellent. CI: confidence interval. OR: Odds ratio. EQ-5D: EuroQol 5 dimensions. VAS: Visual analogue scale (100 = best). OR adjusted for age, gender, region, diagnosis, comorbidities and baseline work ability. a Reference group. Bold indicates p < 0.05. Pseudo R2 = 0.22.