Table 1.
Comparison of circRNA therapy and other approaches.
| Viral vector | DNA | mRNA | CircRNA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expression duration | Years | Weeks | Days | Weeks |
| Delivery | Efficient transduction into postmitotic cells | The non-viral delivery system is inefficient, but its cytotoxicity and immunogenicity are generally low | The non-viral delivery system is inefficient, but its cytotoxicity and immunogenicity are generally low | The non-viral delivery system is inefficient, but its cytotoxicity and immunogenicity are generally low |
| Safety | May induce mutagenesis, with high cytotoxicity and immunogenicity | May induce mutagenesis | Do not induce mutagenesis | Do not induce mutagenesis |
| Manufacture | Cell-based production and high manufacturing cost | Easy to produce and manufacture cost-effectively | Easy to produce and manufacture cost-effectively | Easy to produce and manufacture cost-effectively |
| Limitation | It is not suitable for repeated doses because of its immunogenicity and the size of the cargo is limited | It is very difficult to transduce into postmitotic cells | It is unstable and not suitable for long-term expression | It is more stable than mRNA, but its expression duration depends on the life cycle of the host cell |