Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 15;9(12):e22341. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22341

Table 2.

Different zeolite adsorbents with their operating conditions and performance parameters.

Year Adsorbent Pressure [bar] Temperature [Co] CO2 uptake [mmol g−1] Ref.
2002 CuBTC 1 22 5 [106]
2004 Zeolite 13X 1.6 25 5.1 [107]
2009 Zeolite 13X 1 25 4.7 [108]
2010 Zeolite 13X 5 25 3.2 [109]
2011 Mesoporous alumina 1 25 1.2 [110]
2012 N-rich porous carbon 1 25 2.3 [111]
2015 5A@ZIF-8 1 25 0.31 [112]
2015 Na-RTH zeolite 1 25 3.2 [113]
2017 ZIF-8 1 0 0.499 [114]
2017 Zeolite 13X (13X–F) 8–20 35 3.2 [115]
2017 Na-Rho 1 25 6.1 [116]
2017 Zn/Co-ZIF 1 0 0.727 [117]
2017 Zeolite 13X (13X–C) 8–20 35 6.2 [118]
2017 Na-A 1 25 5.1 [116]
2017 ZIF-67 1 0 0.526 [114]
2017 Zeolite 13X (13X–B) 8–20 35 4.2 [115]
2017 NaTEA-ZSM-25 1 25 4.3 [116]
2017 Na-ZSM-25 1 25 3.9 [116]
2017 Na-ECR-18 1 25 4.4 [116]
2018 Zeolite (Serbia) 4.7 25 1.17 [119]
2018 Basalt-based zeolite
4A
15 20 5.9 [120]
2018 ZY-CS composite 4.7 25 1.7 [119]
2019 CS-ZIF-8 1.1 25 0.99 [121]
2019 Merlinoite zeolite 0.1 25 3.5 [122]
2020 ZeY@CS 1 30 1.64 [123]
2020 Na–Y 5 25 7 [124]