Table 1.

Comparison of polyaniline, Cu, and MoS₂ based electrodes for the glucose sensor.

Electrode material	Sensitivity μAmM−1cm−2	Detection limit	Linear detection range	Ref.
CuO-PANI/FTO	1359	0.24 μM	0.28–4.6 mM	[49]
CuO/NiO/PANI/GCE	–	2 μM	0.02–2.5 mM	[97]
PANI-CuNi	1030	0.2 μM	Up to 5.6 mM	[33]
Cu-MWCNTs	1096	1.0 μM	Up to 7.5 mM	[98]
CuOG-SPCE	2367	34.3 nM	0.122 μM- 0.5 mM	[99]
NiNPs-MWCNTs/Copper	3822	0.7 μM	2 μM-10 mM	[100]
Ni–MoS2 hybrid	1824	0.31 μM	0–4 mM	[101]
NiCo2O4@PANI	4550	4.7350 μM	0.3833 mM	[47]
Cu–PANI/ITO	4140	5 μM	0.02–1 mM	[6]
CuO/MoS2	1055	0.017 μM	35–800 μM	[102]
Cu/PANI	61.6	9.36 μM	0.02–10 mM	[50]
Cu–MoS2	1055	–	0–4 mM	[103]
CuNPs/PANI/graphene	150	0.27 μM	0.001–3.7 mM	[14]
Cu@Pani/MoS2	69.82	1.78 μM	0.1–11 mM	Our work