Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 16;60(4):335–343. doi: 10.29399/npa.28302

Table 4.

Time-dependent changes of the static and dynamic bipedal balance values

Aerobic exercise group (n=16) Strength exercise group (n=11) Control group (n=16) Brunner Langer model (Interaction effect) The comparison of the pre- and post-exercise difference values among the groups
Before After Before After Before After
Bipedal static front-back sway (mm / sec) 7.5 (5–25) 7 (5–15) 7 (5–20) 7 (5–17) 7.5 (4–16) 8 (5–13) p=0.378¥ p=0.343
p=0.507 p=0.513 p=0.223
Bipedal static medio-lateral sway (mm / sec) 7 (4–21) 6 (3–15) 6 (5–14) 7 (5–15) 7 (3–13) 8 (3–13) p=0.067¥¥ pa=0.014§
pb=1.000 pc=0.069
p=0.034* p=0.356 p=0.107
Bipedal static ellipse area (mm2) 330 (100–4329) 203 (53–1579) 263 (134–721) 286 (120–964) 180 (84–2548) 342 (102–1988) p=0.007¥¥ pa=0.003§§
pb=0.792 pc=0.198
p<0.001** p=0.672 p=0.128
Bipedal static perimeter (mm) 349 (220–1043) 338 (225–692) 337 (234–792) 346 (268–720) 341 (173–598) 412 (224–677) p=0.116¥ pª=0.022§
pb=0.378
pc=1.000
p=0.385 p=0.555 p=0.353
Bipedal dynamic front-back sway (mm / sec) 21 (9–47) 16 (10–29) 15 (10–34) 15 (12–28) 17 (6–27) 17 (8–30) p=0.068¥¥ pa=0.004§§
pb=1.000 pc=0.260
p=0.002** p=0.806 p=0.682
Bipedal dynamic medio-lateral sway (mm / sec) 18 (11–57) 13 (11–37) 14 (11–23) 12 (10–24) 15 (7–25) 16 (7–23) p=0.018¥¥ pa=0.013§
pb=1.000
pc=0.166
p=0.001** p=0.178 p=0.758
Bipedal dynamic ellipse area (mm2) 1369 (457–1667) 868 (358–3578) 1316 (402–3786) 955 (294–2550) 1224 (516–5726) 1427 (576–7211) p=0.001¥¥ pa<0.001§§
pb=0.124 pc=0.301
p<0.001** p=0.104 p=0.397
Bipedal dynamic perimeter (mm) 902 (472–2401) 670 (539–1413) 719 (544–1306) 668 (512–1207) 757 (322–1117) 773 (363–1222) p=0.007¥¥ pa=0.005§§
pb=1.000
pc=0.139
p<0.001** p=0.401 p=0.636

Values are expressed as median (minimum – maximum) pa: Control × Aerobic, pb: Control × Strength, pc: Aerobic × Strength.

¥

: Brunner Langer model analysis, p>0.10 indicates that there is no interaction between the independent variables.

¥¥

: Brunner Langer model analysis, p<0.10 indicates an interaction between the independent variables (since the interaction was significant, additional analyses were done. Initially, the differences between pre– and post-exercise values were analyzed with Brunner Langer model analysis in each group, the differences between the first and last measurements among the groups were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis Test).

¥

: p<0.05,

**

: p<0.01 (significant differences between pre- and post-exercise values within each group).

§

: p<0.05,

§§

p<0.01(significant differences between pre- and post-exercise values within each group).