Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 8;23:982. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03702-8

Table 4.

Comparison of overall mean and median of microstrain values during bilateral vertical load application between overdentures with solitary and splinted attachments for different implant surfaces

Implant
surface
Implant position Solitary attachment
(n = 8)
Splinted attachment
(n = 8)
P value
Mean (SD) Median (IQR) Mean (SD) Median (IQR)
Surfaces Mesial 8.64 (1.08) 8.43 (1.91) 15.53 (1.82) 15.03 (3.83) 0.001*
Distal 25.68 (2.03) 26.07 (3.61) 25.52 (2.50) 26.07 (4.76) 0.959
Labial 31.20 (2.73) 29.96 (4.65) 83.79 (3.56) 82.43 (5.47) 0.001*
Lingual 32.03 (1.28) 32.26 (2.23) 39.72 (2.70) 40.79 (5.12) 0.001*
P value

< 0.0001*

P1 = 0.728, P2 = 0.003*, P3 < 0.0001*, P4 = 0.317, P5 = 0.040*, P6 = 1.00

< 0.0001*

P1 = 0.728, P2 < 0.0001*, P3 = 0.012*, P4 = 0.012*, P5 = 0.728, P6 = 0.728

*Statistically significant differences at P value ≤ 0.05, P1: comparison between mesial and distal, P2: comparison between mesial and buccal, P3: comparison between mesial and lingual, P4: comparison between distal and buccal, P5: comparison between distal and lingual, P6: comparison between buccal and lingual