Table 1.
Percentages of relevant linguistic dimensions for each interview from the LIWC analysis
| Dimension | Sub Dimension | Example Words | Study Participants | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nik | Ki | Jo | Shim | |||
| Cognitive Processes | determine, should | 16.3% | 16.3% | 16.4% | 18.0% | |
| Insight | decide, explain | 5.4% | 5.0% | 3.2% | 4.6% | |
| Relativity | deeper, recently | 10.0% | 10.7% | 8.1% | 8.7% | |
| Affective Processes | hope, stupid | 5.1% | 5.3% | 7.2% | 5.4% | |
| Negative Affect | panic, worst | 1.4% | 1.9% | 2.9% | 1.5% | |
| Anger | angry, screwed | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.1% | |
| Sadness | crying, depressed | 0.4% | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.4% | |
| Motivational Drives | love, practice | 5.3% | 5.5% | 6.6% | 6.3% | |
| Achievement | able, plan | 1.4% | 1.9% | 2.1% | 1.9% | |
| Power | help, weakness | 1.6% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.9% | |
| Unique Words | (none) | (none) | swear | death | ||
| Total Linguistic dimension coverage | 87.5% | 92.5% | 93.8% | 89.7% | ||