Table 2.
Sensitive analysis of the included studies in terms of healing rate
| Sensitivity analysis of the healing rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excluding study | MD [95% CI] | P value | I2 (%) | |
| 1 | Abbas (2011) | 0.73 [0.39, 1.37] | 0.33 | 70 |
| 2 | Adamina (2010) | 0.57 [0.28, 1.12] | 0.1 | 75 |
| 3 | Ba-bai-ke-re (2010) | 0.51 [0.28, 0.93] | 0.03 | 66 |
| 4 | Bondi (2017) | 0.65 [0.31, 1.35] | 0.25 | 75 |
| 5 | Christof (2009) | 0.64 [0.31, 1.33] | 0.24 | 75 |
| 6 | Chung (2009) | 0.59 [0.28, 1.22] | 0.15 | 75 |
| 7 | Ellis (2007) | 0.54 [0.28, 1.03] | 0.06 | 72 |
| 8 | Fisher (2015) | 0.57 [0.28, 1.18] | 0.13 | 75 |
| 9 | Ortiz (2009) | 0.73 [0.39, 1.37] | 0.33 | 70 |
| 10 | Schwandner (2013) | 0.61 [0.29, 1.28] | 0.19 | 76 |
| 11 | Van Koperen (2011) | 0.64 [0.31, 1.31] | 0.22 | 76 |
| 12 | Wang (2009) | 0.65 [0.32, 1.34] | 0.24 | 75 |