Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1998 Apr;180(7):1895–1903. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.7.1895-1903.1998

A Nine-Residue Synthetic Propeptide Enhances Secretion Efficiency of Heterologous Proteins in Lactococcus lactis

Y Le Loir 1,*, A Gruss 1, S D Ehrlich 2, P Langella 1
PMCID: PMC107105  PMID: 9537390

Abstract

Lactococcus lactis, a gram-positive organism widely used in the food industry, is a potential candidate for the secretion of biologically useful proteins. We examined the secretion efficiency and capacity of L. lactis by using the Staphylococcus aureus nuclease (Nuc) as a heterologous model protein. When expressed in L. lactis from an efficient lactococcal promoter and its native signal peptide, only ∼60% of total Nuc was present in a secreted form at ∼5 mg per liter. The remaining 40% was found in a cell-associated precursor form. The secretion efficiency was reduced further to ∼30% by the deletion of 17 residues of the Nuc native propeptide (resulting in NucT). We identified a modification which improved secretion efficiency of both native Nuc and NucT. A 9-residue synthetic propeptide, LEISSTCDA, which adds two negative charges at the +2 and +8 positions, was fused immediately after the signal peptide cleavage site. In the case of Nuc, secretion efficiency was increased to ∼80% by LEISSTCDA insertion without altering the signal peptide cleavage site, and the yield was increased two- to fourfold (up to ∼20 mg per liter). The improvement of NucT secretion efficiency was even more marked and rose from 30 to 90%. Similarly, the secretion efficiency of a third protein, the α-amylase of Bacillus stearothermophilus, was also improved by LEISSTCDA. These data indicate that the LEISSTCDA synthetic propeptide improves secretion of different heterologous proteins in L. lactis.


The information necessary for a protein to direct its export from the cell cytoplasm across a membrane has been extensively studied in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (26, 34, 41, 46). Export generally requires a particular N-terminal sequence (called a signal peptide) which directs the precursor to the secretion machinery and is cleaved during successful export of the mature protein (58). While the signal peptide is necessary for export, it is not sufficient, as not all proteins are secreted even if they do bear this sequence (3, 6, 35, 60). This suggests that information in the mature region of a secreted protein is also important for export. Indeed, alterations in the N-terminal end of the mature protein can drastically impair maturation (18, 21, 50, 59). It was also shown that positive charges block export when introduced directly after the signal peptide of exported proteins, while alterations which maintain a neutral or negative charge have little effect on maturation. In all these studies, the wild-type proteins were efficiently exported; only modifications which impair secretion were identified.

Some secreted bacterial proteins are translocated as preproproteins (5, 44, 46). The propeptide, which is processed after translocation, may improve translocation efficiency. Long propeptides (60 to 200 residues), found in most bacterial exoproteases, are autocatalytically cleaved and have an intramolecular chaperone activity (5, 13, 61). Short propeptides (with fewer than 60 residues) are found in different secreted enzymes from gram-positive bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis α-amylase (51), Bacillus cereus β-lactamase (Bla) (22), and Staphylococcus aureus nuclease (Nuc) (7). These propeptides are cleaved by unknown proteases, and their roles in secretion, folding, or stability of the mature protein are uncertain (39). Recent results show that the Nuc propeptide enhances Nuc secretion efficiency in Escherichia coli; it was proposed that the propeptide has Nuc-specific chaperone activity (49).

Here we examine the secretion capacity of Lactococcus lactis, a well-characterized lactic acid bacterium. Several properties of L. lactis make it an attractive host for the secretion of biologically useful proteins in fermentors or directly in food: L. lactis is a food-grade organism and is extensively used in dairy fermentations. Furthermore, a plasmidless strain of L. lactis does not secrete proteases, nor almost anything else, in quantity. A single secreted protein, Usp45, of unknown function (53), can be systematically identified by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), while other secreted proteins are present in trace amounts. This feature could simplify analyses of secreted proteins.

To date, numerous heterologous proteins have been secreted in L. lactis using host-specific or nonnative signal peptides (29, 31, 40, 43, 46, 48, 54; for a review, see reference 8). However, in most of these studies, secretion efficiency (i.e., the proportion of total protein which is present in mature secreted form) was not determined.

In this study, we use staphylococcal Nuc as a model protein to determine whether secretion of heterologous proteins can be efficient in L. lactis. Among the desirable features of Nuc are that it is small, stable, and resistant to denaturation and that its activity can be detected on petri plates as well as in PAGE zymograms. The pre-Nuc reportedly contains an unusually long, 60-residue signal peptide (15). Two active forms of secreted Nuc are detected; the B form includes a 19-residue N-terminal propeptide (Fig. 1). In vivo, this propeptide is removed by proteolytic cleavage, resulting in the A form (7). The nuc gene has already been cloned (42), and Nuc is secreted from numerous gram-positive bacteria, including L. lactis subsp. cremoris, L. lactis subsp. lactis, Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus (17), B. subtilis (15), Corynebacterium glutamicum (19), and Lactobacillus sake (25). In addition, fusions to the N-terminal end of the mature protein do not abolish enzymatic activity (17, 24, 28, 32, 33, 37). In this study we examine different parameters which affect the secretion efficiency of Nuc in L. lactis. We have observed that the absence of the Nuc propeptide results in a marked decrease of secretion efficiency. However, this can be overcome by introducing a 9-residue synthetic propeptide, LEISSTCDA, just after the signal peptide cleavage site. LEISSTCDA also improved the secretion efficiencies of native Nuc and of the α-amylase of B. stearothermophilus (AmyS) (27). While most previous studies on secretion have introduced modifications which impaired export, in this study we show that N-terminal insertion of a specific synthetic peptide can improve export.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Signal peptidase and secondary cleavage sites used by S. aureus, B. subtilis, L. lactis, and C. glutamicum for processing of Nuc. Arrows represent main processing sites, and dashed arrows represent minor processing sites as described in references 7, 19, and 23. The N termini of NucB and NucA of S. aureus Foggie are indicated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.

E. coli TG1 (11) and L. lactis MG1363 (10) were used as hosts. Plasmids used are described in Fig. 2 and listed in Table 1. E. coli was grown on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (38) and incubated at 37°C. L. lactis was grown on M17 medium (52) in which lactose was replaced by 0.5% glucose (M17-Glu) or on brain heart infusion (Difco) and incubated at 30°C. Chemically defined medium (CDM) (36) was used to grow L. lactis for pulse-chase experiments. The following antibiotics were added at the indicated concentrations: erythromycin, 5 μg/ml for L. lactis or 150 μg/ml for E. coli; and ampicillin, 100 μg/ml for E. coli.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Schematic structures of proteins encoded by the indicated plasmids. For details of plasmid construction, see the text and Table 1. The amino acid sequence of the region deleted from NucT is shown in Fig. 4. Black arrowhead, promoter of the native nuc gene (Pstaf) or lactococcal strong promoter (P59); RBS, ribosome binding site of the nuc gene; SP-Nuc, Nuc signal peptide coding region; gray bar, Nuc propeptide coding region; black bar, sequence encoding the LEISSTCDA synthetic propeptide; open bar, NucA or mature AmyS coding sequence (not to scale).

TABLE 1.

Plasmids used in this study

Plasmid Replicon Characteristic(s) of:
Reference or source
Plasmid Cloned nuc or amyS
pBSa ColE1 Apr Stratagene
pIL252 pAMβ1 Emr, low-copy-number plasmid 45
pVE3556 pAMβ1 Emr, derivative of high-copy-number plasmid pIL253 17
pJDC9:P59 pMB9 Emr, E. coli-Streptococcus pneumoniae shuttle vector containing L. lactis promoter P59 N. Galleronb
pNZ10α5 pWV01 Cmr Usp45 signal peptide fused to mature AmyS, expressed from Pusp45 54
pBS: Pstafnucc ColE1 Apr nuc gene expressed from native staphylococcal promoter, Pstaf 17
pBS: PstafLEISSnucc ColE1 Apr LEISSTCDA-NucB precursor expressed from Pstaf 17
pBS:nuc ColE1 Apr Promoterless nuc gene This work
pBS: P59nuc ColE1 Apr NucB precursor expressed from P59 This work
pBS: P59LEISSnuc ColE1 Apr LEISSTCDA-NucB precursor expressed from P59 This work
pBS:nucT ColE1 Apr DNA encodes NucT (not expressed) This work
pNuc3c pVE3556 Emr NucB precursor expressed from Pstaf 17
pNuc6 pVE3556 Emr NucB precursor expressed from P59 This work
pNuc7 pVE3556 Emr LEISSTCDA-NucB precursor expressed from P59 This work
pNuc9 pVE3556 Emr NucT precursor expressed from P59 This work
pNuc10 pVE3556 Emr LEISSTCDA-NucT precursor expressed from P59 This work
pAmy1 ColE1 Apr Promoterless fragment of amyS gene, encodes the mature AmyS This work
pAmy2 ColE1 Apr Nuc signal peptide fused to mature AmyS expressed from P59 This work
pAmy3 ColE1 Apr Nuc signal peptide fused to LEISSTCDA-mature AmyS expressed from P59 This work
pAmy4 ColE1:pIL252 Apr/Emr, E. coli-L. lactis shuttle derivative of pAmy2 This work
pAmy5 ColE1:pIL252 Apr/Emr, E. coli-L. lactis shuttle derivative of pAmy3 This work
a

pBS, pBluescript SK+II. 

b

Laboratoire de Génétique Microbienne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy en Josas, France. 

c

pBS:Pstafnuc, pBS: PstafLEISSnuc, and pNuc3 are referred to as pBS:nuc, pBS:nucmcs, and pIL:nuc, respectively, as previously described (17). 

Nuc and AmyS plate activity assays.

Nuc plate assays were performed as previously described (17). AmyS activity was detected by growing cells on LB or M17-Glu agar plates containing 0.2% starch and, after 48 h, covering the colonies with Lugol solution (Sigma).

DNA manipulations.

Plasmid DNA was isolated essentially as described previously (4) except that for L. lactis, TES buffer (25% sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl; pH 8) containing lysozyme (10 mg/ml) was used for 10 min at 37°C to prepare protoplasts. Enzymes were used as recommended by the suppliers. General procedures for DNA manipulations were performed as described elsewhere (38). Electroporation of L. lactis was performed as described elsewhere (16), and transformants were plated on M17-Glu agar plates containing the required antibiotic.

Amplification by PCR and oligonucleotide synthesis.

PCRs were performed with a Perkin-Elmer Cetus (Norwalk, Conn.) apparatus using Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) as recommended by the manufacturer. Oligonucleotides were synthesized with a DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, San Jose, Calif.). A 762-bp fragment was PCR amplified from the pBS:Pstafnuc matrix (17) (Table 1), which contains the nuc gene devoid of the promoter. The oligonucleotides used were 5′-GGAATTCAAAAGAAAGAGGTGTTAGTTATG-3′ (oligo 1) for the coding strand and 5′-GGAATTCCGATCTAAAAATTATAAAAGT-3′ (oligo 2) for the complementary strand. This DNA fragment was then cloned on pBluescript (pBS) vector in E. coli TG1, resulting in pBS:nuc.

The N-terminal-truncated form of Nuc (NucT) was obtained by PCR amplification of a 560-bp fragment (nucT) from pBS:nuc. The oligonucleotides used were 5′-TGGATGCATCACAAGCAACTTCAACTAAAAAA-3′ (oligo 3) (the underlined sequence corresponds to an inserted NsiI site) for the coding strand and oligo 2 for the complementary strand. An NsiI site was introduced at the 5′ end of this fragment to allow fusions directly after the encoded Nuc signal peptide. The PCR-amplified nucT fragment was cloned into SmaI-cut pBS vector in E. coli TG1, resulting in pBS:nucT.

The mature part of AmyS was obtained by PCR amplification of a 1,655-bp fragment from pNZ10α5 (54). The oligonucleotides used were 5′-ATGCATCCGCACCGTTTAACGGC-3′ (oligo 4) (an NsiI site is underlined) for the coding strand and 5′-TACGTAGAAGTTGAAGCAAGCAA-3′ (oligo 5) for the complementary strand. The inserted NsiI site results in an alteration of the neutral amino acid residue at position +1 from alanine to serine. The PCR-amplified amyS fragment was then cloned into SmaI-cut pBS vector in E. coli TG1, resulting in pAmy1.

Plasmid constructions.

Plasmid constructions are summarized in Fig. 2. Plasmids pNuc6, pNuc7, pNuc9, and pNuc10 were obtained directly in L. lactis. To construct pNuc6, a BamHI/SalI nuc fragment isolated from pBS:nuc was inserted into BamHI/SalI-cut pJDC9:P59, downstream of the strong lactococcal promoter P59. pJDC9:P59 nuc was established in E. coli TG1. The P59 nuc cassette cut by KpnI/BspXI and treated with mung bean nuclease was inserted into XbaI-filled-in pVE3556, resulting in pNuc6.

pNuc7 was obtained by replacement of a SpeI/EcoRI nuc fragment of pNuc6 by a SpeI/EcoRI LEISSTCDAnuc fragment isolated from pBS:PstafLEISSTCDAnuc (17) (this fragment is referred to as pBS:nucmcs) that encodes the Nuc signal peptide followed by LEISSTCDA and NucB. In pNuc6, an NsiI site separates the encoded signal peptide from mature Nuc sequences. In pNuc7, the NsiI site is present just after the encoded LEISSTCDA sequence. Whole-cell lysates and Northern analysis of strains containing pNuc6 and pNuc7 showed that plasmid copy numbers and the quantities of nuc-specific mRNA were equivalent in these strains and thus allowed us to make a direct comparison of Nuc production.

pNuc9 and pNuc10 were obtained by replacement of the NsiI/SacI nuc fragment of pNuc6 or pNuc7, respectively, by the NsiI/SacI nucT fragment purified from pBS:nucT.

Plasmids pAmy1, pAmy2, pAmy3, pAmy4, and pAmy5 were constructed in E. coli; pAmy4 and pAmy5 were then introduced in L. lactis. pAmy2 and pAmy3 were obtained by replacement of the NsiI/XbaI nuc fragment of pBS:P59nuc or pBS:P59LEISSTCDAnuc, respectively, by the NsiI/XbaI amyS fragment of pAmy1. Insertion of XbaI-cut pIL252 into XbaI-cut pAmy2 and pAmy3 resulted in pAmy4 and pAmy5, respectively. All constructions were confirmed by sequencing using the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method.

Protein analysis, immunoblotting, and zymograms.

SDS-PAGE, electroblotting onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore), and immunoblotting were performed as described previously (38) or according to manufacturer recommendations. Antibodies against Nuc, Usp45 and AmyS, raised in rabbits, were kindly provided by J. R. Miller (anti-Nuc) and W. M. de Vos (anti-Usp45 and anti-AmyS). Immunodetection was performed with protein G-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Bio-Rad) and an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Dupont-NEN) as recommended by the suppliers. To compare Nuc distribution or to quantitate Nuc secretion, three to six independent samples were prepared (see below). Samples to be compared were prepared at the same time and loaded on the same gel. After enhanced chemiluminescence detection, different nonsaturated film exposures were scanned with a Scanjet II scanner (Hewlett-Packard) using Deskscan II and ImageQuant programs to get average values. For quantitation, signals were compared to those of known amounts of a commercial NucA control. B and A forms of Nuc were taken into account in these estimations. Nuc enzyme activity was evaluated on zymograms of SDS-PAGE, after removal of the SDS, as described previously (19).

Preparation of cellular and supernatant fractions of L. lactis and N-terminal microsequencing.

For cell fractionation, 2 ml of L. lactis cultures at a given optical density at 600 nm (OD600) were harvested by a 5-min centrifugation at 4°C and 8,000 rpm (Sigma 1K15). The supernatant and cells were processed separately. To compare the amounts of secreted and cell-associated proteins, both cell and supernatant fractions were concentrated. Sample concentration was calculated as follows. The equivalent of 1 ml of 1 OD600 unit of culture (cell or supernatant) was concentrated in a 100-μl final volume as described below, and 10 μl was loaded for SDS-PAGE. Supernatants were filtered on 0.2-μm-pore-size filters (low protein retention; Millisar NML Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (15% final concentration) was added to the filtrate. The resulting pellet was dissolved in 1/20 volume of 50 mM NaOH. Cell pellets were washed once with 1 ml of ice-cold TES, resuspended in TES, and precipitated with TCA (10% final concentration). Cell pellets were then washed once with 1 ml of cold acetone, dried, and resuspended in 70 μl of TES containing lysozyme (1 mg/ml). After 30 min of incubation at 37°C, cells were lysed with 30 μl of 20% SDS. Equal volumes of 2× loading buffer were added to all samples. Bands on the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane corresponding to NucA, NucB, and LEISSTCDA-Nuc forms were cut and subjected to N-terminal microsequencing performed on a gas-phase sequencer (model 477A/HPLC 120A; Perkin-Elmer).

Pulse-chase conditions.

An overnight culture of the appropriate L. lactis strain grown on CDM was used at 2% to inoculate 20 ml of CDM. The culture was incubated at 30°C to an OD600 of 0.45, and 10 ml of this culture was centrifuged. The cell pellet was washed in CDM without methionine, resuspended in CDM without Met, and incubated at 30°C for 5 min. Cultures were pulse labelled for 2 min (a 1-min pulse gave similar results) by the addition of 8 μl of [35S]Met (10 mCi/ml) to 8 ml of Met-depleted culture. A total of 700 μl of 5% Met (2,500-fold excess) was added (chase), and 1-ml samples were taken at given intervals. Samples were precipitated with TCA (20% final concentration) and washed with ice-cold acetone. The pellet was resuspended in 120 μl of NET (150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris; pH 7.8) plus 0.2% lysozyme and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The samples were treated with 1.2 μl of 10% SDS for cell lysis, vortexed, and incubated at 95°C for 5 min. Samples were diluted twofold by the addition of NET plus 2% Triton X-100. Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (23).

RESULTS

nuc gene expression and Nuc secretion efficiency in L. lactis.

The nuc gene with natural expression signals was previously cloned (17) on pIL253, a high-copy-number plasmid (45), resulting in plasmid pNuc3 (Table 1 and Fig. 2). To determine secretion efficiency, cell supernatants and lysates were analyzed by Western blot experiments after SDS-PAGE, using polyclonal antiserum for Nuc detection: secretion efficiency was about 70%, and the remaining 30% was present as a cell-associated precursor (pre-Nuc) (Fig. 3A). This low secretion efficiency is in contrast with that observed for the native protein Usp45 (over 95% secreted) (data not shown) and could be due to the atypical structure of the Nuc signal peptide. When dilutions of commercially purified Nuc were used as a concentration standard, the yield of secreted Nuc was determined to be about 0.5 mg per liter in overnight cultures. To raise expression levels, plasmid pNuc6, in which the nuc promoter was replaced by P59, a strong lactococcal promoter (55), was constructed (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Secreted Nuc levels were about 5 mg per liter of overnight culture, a 10-fold increase compared to expression from pNuc3 (Fig. 3A). In this experiment, secretion efficiency was ∼60%. The amount of secreted Nuc was slightly greater in stationary-phase than in exponential-phase cultures (Fig. 3B), as expected if Nuc accumulates during growth. Taken together, these results show that Nuc is secreted in substantial amounts but inefficiently from L. lactis. Since (i) secretion efficiency of Nuc was not markedly affected by changing promoter strength (Fig. 3A) and (ii) secretion of Usp45 was not affected in any Nuc-secreting L. lactis strain (data not shown), we think that high Nuc production by pNuc6 does not saturate the secretion capacity of the strain but rather that the pre-Nuc is poorly recognized by L. lactis secretion machinery.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

(A) Nuc distribution at low and high expression levels in L. lactis. Proportions of secreted Nuc and accumulated pre-Nuc (prec) were analyzed in overnight cultures in M17-Glu of MG1363 containing pNuc3 or pNuc6 (which produce low and high levels of Nuc, respectively). Western blot experiments of TCA-treated samples are shown. Ten microliters of cells, the equivalent of 0.1 OD600 unit of cells, or culture supernatants thereof was deposited per well. Left panel, low Nuc expression (from pNuc3); center panel, high Nuc expression (from pNuc6); right panel, commercially purified NucA (5 μg/ml; Sigma). (B) Nuc distribution as a function of growth phase. Culture samples of strain MG1363 containing plasmid pNuc6 grown in M17-Glu were taken in exponential phase (EXP) (OD600 = 0.6), early stationary phase (STAT) (OD600 = 2.3), and after overnight growth (ON) (OD600 = 1.9). Western blot experiments were performed on cell lysates and filtered supernatants of each sample, after treatment with 10 and 15% TCA, respectively. Migration positions of precursor (prec) or mature forms of both NucA and NucB (abbreviated as A and B, respectively) are indicated by arrows. C, cell lysates; S, supernatant fractions.

Pre-Nuc is enzymatically inactive.

The strain producing high levels of Nuc (from pNuc6) and a nonproducing strain (containing cloning vector only) have similar growth characteristics, indicating that intracellular accumulation of pre-Nuc is not toxic. This observation suggests that pre-Nuc is inactive in the cytoplasm. Note that mature Nuc is devoid of cysteines and thus should not be affected by intracellular reducing conditions. Pre-Nuc inactivity could be due either to nonoptimal intracellular conditions for enzyme activity, to aggregation, or to the antifolding activity of the Nuc signal peptide (20, 33). SDS-PAGE of cell lysate and supernatant extracts of the L. lactis strain containing pNuc6 was analyzed by zymogram. Both NucA (detected in both cell lysate and supernatant) and NucB (in supernatant) were enzymatically active. Despite the accumulation of ample amounts of pre-Nuc as shown by Western blot experiments, no enzymatic activity was detected at the expected migration position of pre-Nuc on the zymogram. Subsequent analyses of Nuc distribution were therefore performed by immunological assays rather than activity tests. This result indicates that inactivity of the pre-Nuc form is due at least in part to the antifolding activity of the signal peptide.

N-terminal microsequencing of secreted Nuc forms.

Nuc has two mature active forms, B and A (7). The A form results from proteolytic cleavage of B (predominantly at position +19) in S. aureus (7). The predominant mature form in L. lactis, unlike S. aureus, is NucB (Fig. 1). Inefficient cleavage to the NucA form may be due to a scarcity of L. lactis proteases. Both NucB and NucA appear to be stable, as no degradation products were detected by Western blot experiments. N-terminal microsequencing of the secreted forms B and A was performed to determine the cleavage sites of pre-Nuc in L. lactis (Fig. 1). Signal peptide cleavage is conserved and occurred just after the ANA motif, as predicted from von Heijne rules (56). The A form, however, initiated 2 amino acids downstream (+21) of the N-terminal end reported for S. aureus and is identical to the cleavage site found in B. subtilis (23). Cleavage to the NucA form thus appears to involve host proteases. These results show that processing of pre-Nuc in L. lactis is accurate and can result in the export of significant amounts of Nuc which remain stable.

Deletion of 17 residues of the Nuc propeptide results in impaired secretion efficiency in L. lactis.

In L. lactis, the 21-residue Nuc propeptide interferes with neither activity nor cell localization since both B and A forms are active and located in the supernatant. As in C. glutamicum, only trace amounts of NucA are found to be cell associated (Fig. 4) (19). To test the involvement of the Nuc propeptide in the secretion process, we fused the Nuc signal peptide to NucT, an N-terminal truncation of Nuc. In NucT, residues +3 through +19 of the 21-residue propeptide are deleted (Fig. 4A). The first 10 amino acid residues of this mature protein, SQATSTKKLH, have a net charge of +3 (Table 2). As would be expected for a protein with a positively charged mature N-terminal end (57), the secretion efficiency of NucT was very low (30%) (Fig. 4B).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Deletion of 17 amino acid residues of the Nuc propeptide results in impaired secretion efficiency of Nuc in L. lactis. (A) The three last amino acid residues of Nuc signal peptide and the N termini of native NucB and NucT are given. The amino acids deleted in NucT are underlined. Signal peptide cleavage sites (resulting in NucB and NucT) and secondary processing site found in L. lactis (resulting in NucA) are indicated by arrows. (B) MG1363 containing either pNuc6 (encoding Nuc) or pNuc9 (encoding NucT) were grown overnight. Western blot experiments were performed on cell lysates and filtered supernatants of each sample, after treatment with 10 and 15% TCA, respectively. Migration positions of the precursor (prec) or mature (B, A, and T) forms of Nuc are indicated by arrows. C, cell lysates; S, supernatant fractions.

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of heterologous proteins secreted from L. lactis

Protein or fusion protein Sequencea Net charge of first 10 aab of mature protein Secretion efficiency (%)
NucB …ANA|SQTDNGVNRS… 0 60
LEISSTCDA-NucB …ANA|LEISSTCDAS… −2 80
NucT …ANA|SQATSTKKLH +3 30
LEISSTCDA-NucAT …ANA|LEISSTCDAS… −2 90
AmyS …ANA|SAPFNGTMMQ… 0 NDc
LEISSTCDA-AmyS …ANA|LEISSTCDAS… −2 ND
a

The three last residues of the Nuc signal peptide are given. A vertical bar indicates the cleavage site and is followed by the first 10 amino acid residues of the mature protein; italicized and underlined amino acids are positively and negatively charged, respectively. 

b

aa, amino acid residue. 

c

ND, not determined. 

Nuc and NucT secretion efficiency is improved by insertion of a synthetic propeptide (LEISSTCDA) at the N terminus of the mature sequence.

Studies of E. coli indicate that the presence of positively charged amino acids just after the signal peptide cleavage site can result in precursor accumulation (18). We considered Nuc and NucT to be good models to test the converse, i.e., whether the introduction of negative charges at the N terminus of the mature moiety could improve secretion efficiency. For this experiment, we used an oligonucleotide linker which was originally designed to introduce restriction sites for cloning immediately downstream of the sequence encoding the Nuc signal peptide (17) (Table 2 and Fig. 2). The oligonucleotide was designed to avoid codons for positively charged amino acids (17). The synthetic propeptide, LEISSTCDA, adds two negative charges at positions +2 (commonly found in the mature moiety of secreted proteins [57]) and +8. The LEISSTCDA-Nuc fusion is enzymatically active, as judged from PAGE zymograms of culture supernatants (data not shown). The secretion efficiencies of Nuc and LEISSTCDA-Nuc (encoded by pNuc6 and pNuc7, respectively) and those of NucT and LEISSTCDA-NucT (encoded by pNuc9 and pNuc10, respectively) were examined (Fig. 5A and B).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

(A) Nuc distribution is altered by insertion of the LEISSTCDA peptide between the signal peptide and mature Nuc. MG1363 containing either pNuc6 (encoding Nuc) or pNuc7 (encoding LEISSTCDA-Nuc) was grown overnight. Western blotting was performed on cell lysates (C) and filtered supernatants (S) of each sample, after treatment with 10 and 15% TCA, respectively. Migration positions of precursor (prec) or mature forms of both NucA and NucB (abbreviated A and B, respectively) and LEISSTCDA-Nuc (LEISSTCDA-B) are indicated by arrows. (B) NucT secretion efficiency is improved by insertion of the LEISSTCDA peptide just after the Nuc signal peptide. MG1363 containing either pNuc9 (encoding NucT), at left, or pNuc10 (encoding LEISSTCDA-NucT), at right, were grown overnight. Western blotting was performed on cell lysates and filtered supernatants of each culture after treatment with 10 and 15% TCA, respectively. Prec, precursor; T, NucT; LEISSTCDA-T, LEISSTCDA-NucT; C, cell lysates; S, supernatant fractions. (C) Quantitation of Nuc. Supernatants of overnight cultures of MG1363 containing either pNuc6 (encoding Nuc) (center panel) or pNuc7 (encoding LEISSTCDA-Nuc) (right panel) were examined by Western blotting without any TCA precipitation. Amounts of secreted Nuc were determined by scanning blots and comparing signals with those of known amounts of commercially supplied NucA (left panel). Ten microliters was loaded per well. Values given above the lanes indicate NucA concentrations per milliliter. LEISSTCDA-B, LEISSTCDA-Nuc; B, NucB; A, NucA.

Secretion efficiency of LEISSTCDA-Nuc was reproducibly improved compared to that observed for Nuc (∼80% for LEISSTCDA-Nuc compared to ∼60% for Nuc in supernatants). We also observed an increase of mature LEISSTCDA-Nuc protein in the supernatant compared to Nuc, resulting in yields of 10 to 20 mg per liter of culture (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, N-terminal microsequencing of the LEISSTCDA-Nuc secreted product shows that the signal peptide cleavage site is conserved in the LEISSTCDA-Nuc fusion. An even greater effect of LEISSTCDA was observed for NucT (Fig. 5B); secretion efficiency increased from about 30 to 90%. These results show that secretion efficiency is significantly improved by the presence of LEISSTCDA just after the Nuc signal peptide cleavage site, even if different sequences follow.

LEISSTCDA-Nuc precursor is more efficiently processed than pre-Nuc in L. lactis.

Processing of the pre-Nuc and of the pre-LEISSTCDA-Nuc was analyzed by pulse-chase labelling experiments using [35S]Met (Fig. 6). The effect of LEISSTCDA on secretion efficiency was found to be comparable in CDM, medium used for pulse-chase labelling, with that observed in rich medium (data not shown). Pulse-labelled pre-Nuc expressed from pNuc6 was present for at least 1 min after the chase. In contrast, no pre-LEISSTCDA-Nuc expressed from pNuc7 was detected, even at time zero (just after the pulse). These results are consistent with the conclusion that pre-LEISSTCDA-Nuc is processed more efficiently than pre-Nuc in L. lactis, without altering the native cleavage site.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6

Comparison of kinetics of Nuc and LEISSTCDA-Nuc maturation by pulse-chase experiments. MG1363 containing pNuc6 (encoding Nuc) (lanes on the left side) or pNuc7 (encoding LEISSTCDA-Nuc) (lanes on the right side) was grown in CDM and pulse-labelled with [35S]Met for 2 min. Samples were taken at different times after the pulse as indicated (in minutes). The time 0 min corresponds to a sample taken just at the end of the pulse. Positions of migration of different Nuc species were determined by parallel Western blotting performed on labelled samples. A faint contaminating band is present in all lanes at the expected position for LEISSTCDA-Nuc precursor (stippled arrow). As this band is equally present in samples obtained from Nuc and LEISSTCDA-Nuc producers, we suppose that it does not correspond to LEISSTCDA-Nuc precursor. A, NucA; B, NucB; LEISSTCDA-B, LEISSTCDA-Nuc; prec, precursor.

Heterologous proteins have been reported to be targets of degradation by proteases such as Lon or OmpT in E. coli (1, 12). In Western blot experiments, degradation products were not observed. This suggests that both Nuc and LEISSTCDA-Nuc forms are stable and not degraded by cytoplasmic or membrane proteases. Furthermore, the increase in mature LEISSTCDA-Nuc protein compared to mature Nuc protein is consistent with more efficient processing of the precursor, when LEISSTCDA is present.

Insertion of LEISSTCDA peptide improves secretion of AmyS in L. lactis.

We asked whether LEISSTCDA could improve the secretion efficiency of a protein not derived from Nuc. We chose the α-amylase of Bacillus stearothermophilus (AmyS) (27), which has already been expressed in L. lactis (54). The mature region of AmyS was fused to the Nuc signal peptide, followed or not by LEISSTCDA. The first 10 amino acid residues of this mature region, SAPFNGTMMQ, have a neutral net charge, and the insertion of LEISSTCDA adds two negative charges (Table 2). To compare the yields of secretion of AmyS and LEISSTCDA-AmyS, two plasmids containing these fusions, pAmy4 (no LEISSTCDA) and pAmy5 (encoding the LEISSTCDA-AmyS fusion), were introduced in L. lactis. Activity tests on petri plates showed that significantly more LEISSTCDA-AmyS than AmyS was secreted in L. lactis (Fig. 7). Secretion efficiencies of AmyS and LEISSTCDA-AmyS were also compared by Western blots of supernatants and cell fractions of L. lactis strains containing pAmy4 and pAmy5, respectively, with polyclonal antiserum used for AmyS detection (not shown). Cell lysate fractions could not be precisely evaluated due to a contaminating band which obscured the precursor, even after preincubation of AmyS antiserum. However, consistent with activity test results, mature LEISSTCDA-AmyS was readily detected in supernatants, whereas only trace amounts of mature AmyS were detected in overexposed blots. These results indicate that LEISSTCDA-AmyS precursor is more efficiently processed in L. lactis than AmyS. The ensemble of these results indicates that the secretion efficiencies of proteins fused to the Nuc signal peptide are improved by the presence of the LEISSTCDA propeptide.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7

Secretion of AmyS is improved by insertion of the LEISSTCDA peptide just after the signal peptide. Cultures of MG1363 containing pIL252 (negative control) (streak 1), MG1363 containing pAmy4 (Nuc signal peptide followed directly by AmyS) (streak 2), and pAmy5 (Nuc signal peptide followed directly by LEISSTCDA-AmyS fusion) (streak 3) were streaked on M17-Glu agar plates containing 0.2% starch. AmyS secretion was visualized by a Lugol overlay.

DISCUSSION

Role of native Nuc propeptide for secretion of Nuc.

Numerous secreted enzymes, including Nuc, are synthesized with an N-terminal propeptide, which may be subsequently cleaved to generate the mature protein (26, 46). In many cases (but not for Nuc) enzyme activity requires processing of the propeptide to mature protein form. There is evidence that propeptides may also improve secretion efficiency. Recent studies using E. coli, comparing the secretions of NucB and NucA fusions to an E. coli-derived signal peptide, indicate that the 19-residue Nuc propeptide improves secretion efficiency and confers SecA-independent secretion of Nuc (49). Our results show that secretion of the N-terminal truncation of Nuc (NucT) fused to its own signal peptide is also poorly efficient in L. lactis. The first 10 amino acid residues of NucT have a net charge of +3 compared to a neutral net charge for Nuc (Fig. 4 and Table 2). As recently proposed (49), the positive charge at the N-terminal region of NucA may inhibit its secretion efficiency by a possible interaction with the negatively charged heads of the membrane phospholipids. Other studies of E. coli confirm the importance of the mature moiety in secretion efficiency (2, 9, 18, 57, 58). Results with NucT, showing poor secretion efficiency of a protein containing a positively charged N terminus, extend these observations to L. lactis.

Alterations in the Nuc mature moiety improve secretion efficiency of Nuc and recombinant proteins.

In our model system, about 60% of native Nuc was secreted, while the rest was detected as cell-associated precursor. This is in contrast to most previous studies, in which the initial proteins were well processed, so any enhancement of secretion efficiency would not have been detected. We exploited pre-Nuc accumulation to show that the peptide LEISSTCDA improved secretion efficiency to ∼80% when inserted just after the Nuc signal peptide. This improvement was accompanied by a two- to fourfold increase in the amounts of Nuc-secreted product (up to 20 mg per liter). Similar experiments in which several synthetic peptides were inserted just after the signal peptide in a heterologous hybrid protein in B. subtilis resulted in slightly enhanced secretion; however, processing occurred at an altered cleavage site (14). In contrast to the results of those previous studies, LEISSTCDA-Nuc fusions conserve the original cleavage site. Improved secretion efficiency by LEISSTCDA insertion was even more dramatic for the protein devoid of its propeptide (NucT); in this case, the level of secreted product rose from ∼30 to ∼90% of the total protein. Improved secretion efficiency was also shown for AmyS. It thus appears that the sequence information in the first 10 amino acid residues of the mature moiety are critical for efficient secretion driven by the Nuc signal peptide in L. lactis. These results show that LEISSTCDA acts as efficiently as the native propeptide in enhancing Nuc secretion. It will be of interest to determine whether, like the Nuc propeptide in E. coli (49), the presence of LEISSTCDA obviates the need for SecA in NucT translocation.

How does LEISSTCDA insertion improve secretion?

LEISSTCDA alters the N terminus of the mature protein by introducing two negative charges at the +2 and +8 positions. Insertion of this peptide could affect precursor conformation and thus facilitate its processing by cytoplasmic secretory chaperones, or it might optimize the charge balance around the signal cleavage site to facilitate translocation. Both of these effects could be involved in improved secretion. The presence of a negatively charged amino acid residue at position +2 is particularly common in secreted proteins (57). Studies of E. coli have led von Heijne to propose the positive-inside rule, in which the charge at the N terminus of a precursor protein should be superior to the charge surrounding the cleavage site (including the N terminus of the mature protein) for efficient translocation (57). Our results conform to this rule and may further suggest that negative charges in the mature protein can enhance export. We propose that peptides like LEISSTCDA could be of particular interest for the secretion of recombinant proteins.

Secretion of heterologous proteins in L. lactis.

Several gram-positive organisms, including B. subtilis (for reviews, see references 26 and 46), Streptococcus gordonii, Staphylococcus xylosus, Staphylococcus carnosus, Listeria monocytogenes, C. glutamicum, and Lactobacillus plantarum, have been successfully used either for export of recombinant proteins or for antigen display on the cell surface. We selected L. lactis as a potential secretion host, rather than the above-mentioned organisms, because it has the particularity of being one of the major species used in the food industry, which ensures that it is nontoxic. L. lactis has already been successfully tested as a vaccine vector (30). It is also the best characterized of the lactic acid bacteria and will allow us to examine secretion at the genetic level. The parameters identified in the present study that affect secretion efficiency will be helpful in directing a choice of secretion vector. In these studies, export efficiency in L. lactis was improved by altering the N-terminal sequence of the mature protein to be exported. These results should allow us to examine and potentially optimize secretion efficiency of other fusion proteins in L. lactis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful to Patricia Anglade for N-terminal microsequencing analyses of Nuc, Sophie Sourice for DNA sequencing, and Patrick Régent for photography. We thank James Miller and Willem de Vos for their generous gifts of antisera against Nuc and against AmyS and Usp45, respectively. We thank Paul Recsei for discussion of his own Nuc results, Laurent Brétigny for his technical contribution, and Jamila Anba and Cathy Schouler for their advice during this work. We are very grateful to Emmanuelle Maguin, Jean-Christophe Piard, and Isabelle Poquet for constant discussion during the course of this work and to I. Poquet for providing her unpublished data.

This work was financed in part by Biotech program BIOT-CT94-3055.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baneyx F, Georgiou G. In vivo degradation of secreted fusion proteins by the Escherichia coli outer membrane protease OmpT. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:491–494. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.1.491-494.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barkocy-Gallagher G A, Bassford P J., Jr Synthesis of precursor maltose-binding protein with proline in the +1 position of the cleavage site interferes with the activity of Escherichia coli signal peptidase I in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:1231–1238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bieker K L, Silhavy T J. The genetics of protein secretion in E. coli. Trends Genet. 1990;6:329–334. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Birnboim H, Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7:1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Braun P, Tommassen J, Filloux A. Role of the propeptide in folding and secretion of elastase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 1996;19:297–306. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.381908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen M W, Nagarajan V. A cytoplasmic protein is incompatible for export of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5697–5700. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.17.5697-5700.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Davis A, Moore I B, Parker D S, Taniuchi H. Nuclease B: a possible precursor of nuclease A, an extracellular nuclease of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem. 1977;252:6544–6553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Vos W M, Simons G F M. Gene cloning and expression in lactococci. In: Gasson M J, de Vos W M, editors. Genetics and biotechnology of lactic acid bacteria. London, England: Chapman and Hall; 1994. pp. 52–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duffaud G, Inouye M. Signal peptidases recognize a structure feature at the cleavage site of secretory proteins. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:10224–10228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gasson M J. Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic acid streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J Bacteriol. 1983;154:1–9. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.1-9.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gibson T J. Ph.D. thesis. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gottesman S. Regulation by proteolysis. In: Neidhardt F C, Ingraham J L, Low K B, Magasanik B, Schaechter M, Umbarger H E, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Vol. 2. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1987. pp. 1308–1312. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ikemura H, Inouye M. In vitro processing of prosubtilisin produced in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:12959–12963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Itoh Y, Kanoh K, Nakamura K, Takase K, Yamane K. Artificial insertion of peptides between signal peptide and mature protein: effect on secretion and processing of hybrid thermostable α-amylases in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli cells. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:1551–1558. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-8-1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kovacevic S, Veal L E, Hsiung H M, Miller J R. Secretion of staphylococcal nuclease by Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1985;162:521–528. doi: 10.1128/jb.162.2.521-528.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Langella P, Le Loir Y, Ehrlich S D, Gruss A. Efficient plasmid mobilization by pIP501 in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5806–5813. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.18.5806-5813.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Le Loir Y, Gruss A, Ehrlich S D, Langella P. Direct screening of recombinants in gram-positive bacteria using the secreted staphylococcal nuclease as a reporter. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:5135–5139. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.16.5135-5139.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li P J, Beckwith J, Inouye H. Alteration of the amino terminus of the mature sequence of a periplasmic protein can severely affect protein export in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:7685–7689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.20.7685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liebl W, Sinskey A J, Schleifer K H. Expression, secretion, and processing of staphylococcal nuclease by Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:1854–1861. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.6.1854-1861.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu G, Topping T B, Randall L L. Physiological role during export for the retardation of folding by the leader peptide of maltose-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:9213–9217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.MacIntyre S, Eschbach M L, Mutschler B. Export incompatibility of N-terminal basic residues in a mature polypeptide of Escherichia coli can be alleviated by optimising the signal peptide. Mol Gen Genet. 1990;221:466–474. doi: 10.1007/BF00259413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mézes P S F, Yang Y Q, Hussain M, Lampen J O. Bacillus cereus 569/H β-lactamase I: cloning in Escherichia coli and signal sequence determination. FEBS Lett. 1983;161:195–200. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)81006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miller J R, Kovacevic S, Veal L E. Secretion and processing of staphylococcal nuclease by Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:3508–3514. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.8.3508-3514.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller J R, Veal L E, Kovacevic S. Human growth hormone-nuclease fusion proteins: Bacillus subtilis mutants with altered growth hormone production and secretion. In: Ganesan A T, Hoch J A, editors. Genetics and biotechnology of bacilli. Vol. 2. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press, Inc.; 1988. pp. 377–382. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Morel, F. 1997. Personal communication.
  • 26.Nagarajan V. Protein secretion. In: Sonenshein A L, Hoch J A, Losick R, editors. Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1993. pp. 713–726. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nakajima R, Imanaka T, Aiba S. Nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus stearothermophilus α-amylase gene. J Bacteriol. 1985;163:401–406. doi: 10.1128/jb.163.1.401-406.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Neuberger M S, Williams G T, Fox R O. Recombinant antibodies possessing novel effector functions. Nature. 1984;312:604–608. doi: 10.1038/312604a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Norton P M, Brown H W, Wells J M, MacPherson A M, Wilson P W, Le Page R W. Factors affecting the immunogenicity of tetanus toxin fragment C expressed in Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1996;14(2–3):167–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Norton P M, Wells J M, Brown H W, MacPherson A M, Le Page R W. Protection against tetanus toxin in mice nasally immunized with recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing tetanus toxin fragment C. Vaccine. 1997;15:616–619. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(96)00241-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Perez-Martinez G, Kok J, Venema G, van Dijl J M, Smith H, Bron S. Protein export elements from Lactococcus lactis. Mol Gen Genet. 1992;234:401–411. doi: 10.1007/BF00538699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Piard J C, Jimenez-Diaz R, Ehrlich S D, Fischetti V A, Gruss A. The M6 protein of Streptococcus pyogenes and its potential as a tool to anchor biologically active molecules at the surface of lactic acid bacteria. In: Horaud T, editor. Streptococci and the host. New York, N.Y: Plenum Press; 1997. pp. 545–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Poquet I, Ehrlich S D, Gruss A. An export-specific reporter designed for gram-positive bacteria: application to Lactococcus lactis. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:1904–1912. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.7.1904-1912.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pugsley A P. The complete general secretory pathway in gram-negative bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:50–108. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.1.50-108.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Puohiniemi R, Simonen M, Muttilainen S, Himanen J P, Sarvas M. Secretion of Escherichia coli outer membrane proteins OmpA and OmpF in Bacillus subtilis is blocked at an early intracellular step. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:981–990. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb02164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Raya, R. 1997. Personal communication.
  • 37.Recsei, P. Personal communication.
  • 38.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sasamoto H, Nakasawa K, Tsutsumi K, Takase K, Yamane K. Signal peptide of Bacillus subtilis α-amylase. J Biochem. 1988;106:376–382. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a122861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Savijoki K, Kahala M, Palva A. High-level heterologous protein production in Lactococcus and Lactobacillus using a new secretion system based on the Lactobacillus brevis S-layer signals. Gene. 1997;186:255–262. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00717-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schatz G, Dobberstein B. Common principles of protein translocation across membranes. Science. 1996;271:1519–1526. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5255.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shortle D. A genetic system for analysis of staphylococcal nuclease. Gene. 1983;22:181–189. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90102-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sibakov M, Koivula T, von Wright A, Palva I. Secretion of TEM β-lactamase with signal sequences isolated from the chromosome of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:341–348. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.2.341-348.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Silen J L, Agard D A. The α-lytic protease pro-region does not require a physical linkage to activate the protease domain in vivo. Nature. 1989;341:462–464. doi: 10.1038/341462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Simon D, Chopin A. Construction of a vector plasmid family and its use for molecular cloning in Streptococcus lactis. Biochimie. 1988;70:559–566. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(88)90093-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Simonen M, Palva I. Protein secretion in Bacillus species. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:109–137. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.1.109-137.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Simons G, Rutten G, Rutten G, Nijhuis M, van Asseldonk M. Production of prochymosin in lactococci. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1992;306:115–120. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-6012-4_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Steidler L, Wells J M, Raeymaekers A, Vandekerckhove J, Fiers W, Remaut E. Secretion of biologically active murine interleukin-2 by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:1627–1629. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1627-1629.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Suciu D, Inouye M. The 19-residue pro-peptide of staphylococcal nuclease has a profound secretion-enhancing ability in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1996;21:181–195. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.6211341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Summers R G, Knowles J R. Illicit secretion of a cytoplasmic protein into the periplasm of Escherichia coli requires a signal peptide plus a portion of the cognate secreted protein. Demarcation of the critical region of the mature protein. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:20074–20081. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Takase K, Mizuno H, Yamane K. NH2-terminal processing of Bacillus subtilis α-amylase. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:11548–11553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Terzaghi B E, Sandine W E. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1975;29:807–813. doi: 10.1128/am.29.6.807-813.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.van Asseldonk M, Rutten G, Oteman M, Siezen R J, de Vos W M, Simons G. Cloning of usp45, a gene encoding a secreted protein from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis MG1363. Gene. 1990;95:155–160. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90428-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.van Asseldonk M, de Vos W M, Simons G. Functional analysis of the Lactococcus lactis usp45 secretion signal in the secretion of a homologous proteinase and a heterologous α-amylase. Mol Gen Genet. 1993;240:428–434. doi: 10.1007/BF00280397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.van der Vossen J M B M, van der Lelie D, Venema G. Isolation and characterization of Streptococcus cremoris Wg2-specific promoters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:2452–2457. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.10.2452-2457.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.von Heijne G. How signal sequences maintain cleavage specificity. J Mol Biol. 1984;173:243–251. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.von Heijne G. Net N-C charge imbalance may be important for signal sequence function in bacteria. J Mol Biol. 1986;192:287–290. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.von Heijne G. The signal peptide. J Membr Biol. 1990;115:195–201. doi: 10.1007/BF01868635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yamane K, Mizushima S. Introduction of basic amino acid residue after the signal peptide inhibits protein translocation across the cell membrane of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:19690–19696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zagorec M, Steinmetz M. Expression of levansucrase-β-galactosidase hybrids inhibits secretion and is lethal in Bacillus subtilis. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:1137–1143. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-6-1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhu X, Ohta Y, Jordan F, Inouye M. Pro-sequence of subtilisin can guide the refolding of denatured subtilisin in an intermolecular process. Nature. 1989;339:483–484. doi: 10.1038/339483a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES