Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2023 Oct 6;41(Suppl 2):S134–S152. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.034

Table 4.

Summary of indicators supporting an assessment of the probability of technical and regulatory success for a norovirus vaccine candidate.

Probability of success theme Indicator Summary Rating
Biological Feasibility Most advanced vaccine candidate(s)
  • Four candidates have undergone clinical trials with the most advance (HilleVax Bivalent GI.1/GII.4 VLP) heading into phase III trials in 2022.

  • Other three candidates in phase I/II.

Low-Moderate
Existence of immunity from natural exposure
  • Natural exposure causes asymptomatic and symptomatic infections, both of which are associated with both humoral and cellular immune responses.

  • Cohort studies conclude that prior infection confers protection against reinfection to the same genotype and potentially to the same serogroup/different serotype; duration is unclear.

  • Adult volunteer study results provide conflicting results, suggesting limited infection- related protection.

Moderate
Understanding mechanisms of immunity
  • Recent studies focusing on host differences (HBGA phenotypes for example) may partially explain early results of lack of protective immunity conferred by a prior infection.

  • Long term protection, mucosal/systemic immune response induction, and cross-protection against heterogeneous epitopes is not fully understood.

Low
Likelihood of vaccine protection against the majority of pathogenic strains
  • Strong evidence that protection is provided against the homologous genotype.

  • Less evidence that protection may also be against the homologous genogroup despite different genotype (although there may be differences for given serotypes).

  • Vaccine will need to include the most common genogroup/genotypes.

Low
Product Development Feasibility Existence of animal models to facilitate vaccine development
  • Mouse model and zebra-fish model are being increasingly explored.

  • Mouse models do not recapitulate human infection and appear to have different receptor/attachment mechanisms.

Low-Moderate
Existence of in vitro assays to facilitate vaccine development
  • Several antibody tests have been developed and are under evaluation.

  • HBGA blocking antibodies may prove most helpful for establishing correlates for future studies, but this is still under evaluation.

  • The exact host cell receptor molecule(s) necessary for attachment and invasion are not identified.

Moderate
Ease of Clinical Development
  • Clinical trials following the “rotavirus clinical trials model” are likely the norm and currently being implemented for Phase III trials.

  • Challenges will include dealing with genotype diversity and role of coinfections.

High
Availability or need for human challenge models
  • Human challenge models have been important for the “proof of concept” of vaccine associated protection.

  • Current efforts include the development of suitable genogroup/genotype candidates for human challenge.

  • Licensure in HIC adults/travelers through use of CHIM are reasonable given recent precedence

Moderate-High