Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 20;48(4):149–155. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D23-034

Fig. 1. The structure (A) and the effect of PI-28 (16) on the radicle elongation of O. minor (B, C). (B) The images were obtained at 9 DAT with 1, 3, and 10 ppm PI-28 or without PI-28 (control) together with 1 ppm rac-GR24 as a germination stimulant. (C) The radicle lengths of O. minor in each treatment at 9 DAT were measured using Image J software and shown as a boxplot. Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among the treatments evaluated via the Turkey–Kramer test, n=54–65.

Fig. 1. The structure (A) and the effect of PI-28 (16) on the radicle elongation of O. minor (B, C). (B) The images were obtained at 9 DAT with 1, 3, and 10 ppm PI-28 or without PI-28 (control) together with 1 ppm rac-GR24 as a germination stimulant. (C) The radicle lengths of O. minor in each treatment at 9 DAT were measured using Image J software and shown as a boxplot. Different letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among the treatments evaluated via the Turkey–Kramer test, n=54–65.