Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 27;4:1181583. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1181583

Table 4.

Summary of laboratory evidence for PMDD.

Authors Study sample Age (years)
Mean (SD)/range
Findings
Genetics
Comasco (49) PMDD—31
Healthy controls—31
Not available 5-HTTLPR and BDNF Val66Met polymorphisms not associated with PMDD.
Met-allele carrier -lower emotion-induced fronto-cingulate cortex activation during luteal phase in PMDD
Dhingra (47) PMDD—53 women
Healthy controls—51
PMDD—27–46
Healthy controls—22–48
Presence of at least one C allele of serotonergic 5HT1A receptor associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of PMDD
Huo (48) PMDD—91
Healthy controls—56
39.5 ± 5.9 SNPs in oestrogen receptor α-gene (ESR1) positively associated with PMDD
Endocrinal
Progesterone/allopregnanolone/oestrogen
Klatzkin (51) Prior depression with PMDD (PMDD-Dep) = 13
Non-PMDD Depression (Non-PMDD-Dep) = 12
Non-Dep PMDD = 23
Non-PMDD, Non-Dep = 29
PMDD-Dep—33.8 (1.8)
Non-PMDD-Dep—36.5 (1.9)
non-Dep PMDD—31.7 (2.1)
Non-PMDD, Non-Dep—33.6 (1.6)
Non-Dep PMDD had higher pre-progesterone and allopregnanolone levels following progesterone administration than other groups
Hsiao (45) PMDD = 43 30.79 (7.13) No statistically significant correlations between depression or anxiety ratings and oestrogen or progesterone concentrations
Neurotransmitters
Serotonin
Rasgon (44) PMS  = 5
Healthy Control = 5
PMS—24 ± 0
Healthy control—27 ± 4
L-tryptophan challenge PMS >HC
blunted whole blood serotonin response in the luteal phase
Rapkin (52) PMS = 14
Healthy controls = 13
Age: NA Serotonin-PMS < Healthy Control
Dopamine and norepinephrine
Menkes (53) PMS = 16 37.9 ± 5.8 Significant premenstrual tyrosine decrement
Neuroimaging
Structural imaging
Syan et al. (54) PMDD—20
Healthy controls—25
PMDD—31.80 ± 7.33
Healthy controls—27.44 ± 7.74
No significant group effect
Berman et al. (55) PMDD—12
Healthy controls—13
PMDD—30.9 ± 6.63
Healthy controls—29.2 ± 6.50
PMDD > HC: ↑ grey matter volume cerebellum
Protopopescu et al. (56) PMDD—10
Healthy controls—11
29 (22–35) No significant group effect
Functional imaging
Emotional stimuli-reactivity
Petersen et al. (50) PMDD—18
Healthy controls—18
PMDD—29.2 ± 7.24
Healthy controls—25.4 ± 6.99
DLPFC reactivity for PMDD lower in the late luteal phase compared with healthy subjects and follicular phase
Gingnell et al. (57) PMDD—14
Healthy controls—13
PMDD—35 ± 8.9
Healthy controls—33.1 ± 7.8
↑amygdala activity and functional connectivity between the amygdala, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during the late luteal phase in PMDD
Comasco et al. (49) PMDD—16
Healthy controls—15
PMDD—33.3 ± 8.9
Healthy controls—30.5 ± 8.1
PMDD >HC- ↑activations in the inferior and middle frontal gyri, right superior parietal gyrus, and left angular gyrus to negative facial expressions
Gingnell et al. (58) PMDD—14
Healthy controls—14
PMDD—35 ± 8.9
Healthy controls—32.7 ± 7.7
Luteal phase PMDD >HC hyperactivations in lateral OFC, mPFC, and DLPFC regions during the anticipation of negative pictures
Gingnell et al. (59) PMDD—14
Healthy controls—15
PMDD—34.9 ± 8.9
Healthy controls—33.7 ± 8.4
PMDD >CS mid-follicular phase, positive correlation between P4 levels and amygdala BOLD response to angry and fearful faces, PMDD >CS: ↑ amygdala BOLD signal during the mid-follicular phase
Protopopescu et al. (56) PMDD—8
Healthy controls—12
PMDD—27.4 (22–33)
Healthy controls—28.0 (22–35)
PMDD >HC ↑ amygdala BOLD signal during the late luteal phase, ↓ NAcc activation for the positive condition in women with PMDD compared with healthy Controls during the late luteal phase.
Neurocognitive tasks
Baller et al. (60) PMDD—14
Healthy controls—14
PMDD—38.1 ± 8.2
Healthy controls—36.0 ± 8
PMDD > HC: ↑ activations of superior and middle frontal gyri, inferior parietal lobule and cerebellum during N-back working memory task
Bannbers et al. (61) PMDD—14
Healthy controls—13
PMDD—34.9 ± 8.9
Healthy controls—34.9 ± 8.6
↓ activation pre- and post-central gyri, parietal cortex, right caudate nucleus, and the left insula during the mid-follicular phase
PMDD >HC: ↑ left insula reactivity during response inhibition during the late luteal phase
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Liu et al. (62) PMDD—20
Healthy controls—20
PMDD—23.0 ± 1.6
Healthy controls—23.6 ± 1.4
PMDD <HC: ↓GABA = anterior cingulate cortex/medical prefrontal Cortex, basal ganglia
↓GABA/creatine ratio anterior cingulate cortex/medical prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia
↑ glutamate–glutamine/GABA ratio anterior cingulate cortex/medical prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia
Batra et al. (63) PMDD—12
Healthy controls—13
PMDD—35.0 ± 4.61
Healthy controls—30.0 ± 8.14
Mid-FP >late LP: ↑ glutamate/creatine ratio mPFC in both groups
No group effect
Epperson et al. (64) PMDD—9
Healthy controls—14
PMDD—34.6 ± 4.5
Healthy controls—30.1 ± 6.23
PMDD <CS during Follicular Phase
FP >mid/late LP: ↑ GABA in CS
FP <mid/late LP: ↓ GABA in PMDD
Rasgon et al. (65) PMDD—5
Healthy controls—7
PMDD—29.0 ± 4.5
Healthy controls—28.0 ± 9.9
mid-FP > late LP: ↓ NAA/Cr ratio mPFC GM in both
groups
mid-FP >late LP: ↑ Ch/Cr ratio parietal WM in both groups
Jovanovic et al. (66) PMDD—5
Healthy controls—5
PMDD—32.4 ± 6.2
Healthy controls—30.2 ± 7.6
CS: late LP > FP: ↑ 5-HT1A binding in dorsal RN
PMDD: no change