Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 27;14:1241131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241131

Table 2.

RT (reaction time) and strategy switching costs (ms) (M ± SD) under different conditions in Experiment 1 (N = 57).

Motivation UD repetition UD switching DU repetition DU switching Costs
High approach 2252.52 ± 531.12 2416.57 ± 564.21 2484.75 ± 564.69 2505.08 ± 536.58 184.37 ± 340.59
Low approach 2225.96 ± 527.50 2392.20 ± 482.85 2363.69 ± 454.47 2464.69 ± 537.78 267.23 ± 448.76
Neutral 2390.01 ± 530.68 2439.03 ± 545.20 2428.37 ± 529.15 2408.06 ± 550.39 28.71 ± 398.37
Low avoidance 2311.53 ± 541.59 2362.29 ± 511.63 2421.47 ± 529.15 2452.13 ± 531.86 81.41 ± 339.62
High avoidance 2364.22 ± 519.00 2346.86 ± 585.19 2446.87 ± 506.56 2332.76 ± 488.65 −131.47 ± 327.24

The cost is calculated by subtracting the repetition reaction time of both the UD and DU from the switching reaction time of both the UD and DU.