Arnold 2012.
Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study of duloxetine in fibromyalgia | |
Participants | Women and men > 18 years of age who met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for primary fibromyalgia and had a score of > 4 on the average pain severity item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)‐Modified Short Form. Patients with or without major depressive disorder or generalised anxiety disorder, as defined by the DSM‐IV and confirmed by the MINI were included. | |
Interventions | Duloxetine 30 mg capsules or placebo for 12 weeks | |
Outcomes | Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes | Lilly study. No other bias identified | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation by a computer‐generated random sequence using an interactive voice response system (IVRS) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The duloxetine and placebo capsules were identical in appearance to maintain the blinding. Participants and investigators were kept blinded to the rescue criteria and dose increase; site personnel entered the major depressive disorder status at baseline and the CGI‐I for Depression scores through IVRS at every visit |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Only 2 dropouts, both from duloxetine group and likely to have been of minimal significance |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Most outcomes presented except individual BPI severity items (worst pain, least pain, pain right now). However, no other outcomes with significant effect in completely negative trial |
Other bias | Low risk | Lilly study. No other bias identified |