Chappell 2008.
Methods | Six‐month, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, clinical trial of duloxetine in fibromyalgia | |
Participants | Male and female outpatients were eligible for the study if they were ≥ 18 years of age, met criteria for fibromyalgia as defined by the American College of Rheumatology, with or without major depressive disorder No criteria for pain level at entry |
|
Interventions | Duloxetine ‐ variable dose. Started at 60 mg (30 mg run in period over 1 week), randomised increase to 120 mg after 13 weeks if not > 50% reduction in pain on BPI average | |
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated random sequence within each study centre stratified by major depressive disorder |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Double‐blind |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Participants "blinded", but not clear how the study managed dose escalations and decreases and whether blinding was maintained |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 37.6% to 38.6% discontinuations, significantly different in lack of efficacy only. Investigators used LOCF and MMRM to correct for dropouts |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | 30% improvement in BPI‐average added post hoc |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Lilly sponsored trial Significant unexplained treatment by investigator interaction |