Table 2.
The relationship between characteristics of patients and appointment mode.
| Characteristics | Appointment mode | |
|---|---|---|
| ρ | P | |
| Sex | 0.037 | .524 |
| Age | –0.057 | .327 |
| Health concern | 0.044 | .445 |
| Independent medical | –0.051 | .377 |
| History of similar APP | –0.107 | .064 |
| SOAIB | 0.043 | .462 |
| SODIB | –0.043 | .454 |
| EEIB | –0.126 | .029* |
| Internet better than tradition | –0.090 | .118 |
| IIC | –0.024 | .683 |
| WMT | 0.118 | .041* |
| Treatment expense | –0.025 | .665 |
| Escorts | 0.089 | .122 |
| Overall treatment time | 0.039 | .506 |
| Prognostic effect | 0.026 | .649 |
Spearman correlation test was used.
EEIB = evaluation of the effectiveness of Internet booking, IIC = internet medical treatment can improve the condition of medical treatment and health quality, SOAIB = score of advantages of Internet booking, SODIB = score of disadvantages of Internet booking, WMT = waiting in line for medical treatment.
*
P < .05.