Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 8;46(12):1538–1543. doi: 10.1002/clc.24144

Table 3.

Unadjusted and adjusted model for the association between CDAI and the risk of HF.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value
CDAI 0.93 (0.90−0.95) <.0001 0.95 (0.92−0.98) .002 0.96 (0.94−0.99) .02
CDAI
Q1 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
Q2 0.82 (0.66−1.02) .08 0.87 (0.68−1.12) .27 0.88 (0.68−1.13) .30
Q3 0.58 (0.48−0.72) <.0001 0.69 (0.55−0.87) .002 0.77 (0.61−0.99) .04
Q4 0.47 (0.38−0.59) <.0001 0.61 (0.48−0.79) <.001 0.68 (0.52−0.89) .01

Note: Model 1: Unadjusted; Model 2: Adjusted with gender + age + education + poverty; Model 3: Adjusted with model 2 + smoke + drink + hypertension + MetS + hyperlipidemia + CKD.

Abbreviations: CDAI, composite dietary antioxidants index; HF, heart failure; MetS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratio.