Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 12;14:8040. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43719-9

Table 2.

DNA methylation associated with T2D in the Islet T2D case-control cohort within genes differentially expressed in islets from T2D cases vs. controls that also associated with future T2D based on blood DNA methylation in the prospective EPIC-Potsdam T2D case-control study

Islet T2D case-control cohort EPIC-Potsdam
DNA methylation RNA-seq Blood DNA methylation
CpG site Absolute difference P-value Odds ratio
(95% CI)
P-value Gene P-value Odds ratio
(95% CI)
P-value
cg05324789 −3.50% 3.2 × 10−4 0.77 (0.65−0.90) 0.0014 NKX6.2 4.3 × 10−5 0.43 (0.24−0.76) 0.004
cg20355381 −5.60% 4.4 × 10−7 0.63 (0.47−0.78) 3.1 × 10−4 CABLES1 1.2 × 10−4 0.56 (0.37−0.84) 0.006
cg15167202 −4.70% 6.8 × 10−4 0.85 (0.76−0.94) 0.0027 SYNPO 3.0 × 10−4 0.43 (0.20−0.94) 0.034
cg10339923 −8.30% 5.0 × 10−8 0.76 (0.66−0.86) 4.9 × 10−5 RHOT1 3.3 × 10−4 0.68 (0.47−0.97) 0.035

For islet DNA methylation, both absolute difference (cases-controls) based on linear regression and odds ratios based on logistic regression are shown.