Uncomplicated urinary tract infections are among the most frequently occurring infections in the United States, resulting in an estimated 8 million office visits and 1 million hospital admissions each year.1,2,3 Between 40% and 50% of women have reported having at least one urinary tract infection in their lives.4
Urinary tract infections can be classified by anatomic site of involvement into lower and upper urinary tract infections. Infections of the lower urinary tract include cystitis, urethritis, prostatitis, and epididymitis, and those of the upper urinary tract include pyelonephritis. Urinary tract infections may be further classified as complicated or uncomplicated. In women with a structurally and functionally normal urinary tract, cystitis and pyelonephritis are considered uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Urinary tract infections in men, elderly people, pregnant women, or patients who have an indwelling catheter or an anatomic or functional abnormality are considered complicated urinary tract infections. In this article, we outline the pharmacologic approach to the prevention and treatment of uncomplicated cystitis.
ETIOLOGY
Risk factors for urinary tract infections in women include frequent sexual intercourse, lack of urination after intercourse, use of a diaphragm, use of a spermicide, and a history of recurrent urinary tract infections.5,6 Although the long-term adverse effects associated with uncomplicated urinary tract infections appear to be minimal, if left untreated, urinary tract infections can interfere with daily living. As many as 80% of uncomplicated urinary tract infections are caused by Escherichia coli, followed by Staphylococcus saprophyticus in as many as 5% to 15% of cases. Enterococci, Klebsiella species and Proteus mirabilis account for a small percentage of overall infections.7
OVERVIEW OF ANTIBIOTICS
The antimicrobial agents most commonly used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections include the combination drug trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, and fosfomycin tromethamine. These agents are used primarily because of their tolerability, spectrum of activity against suspected uropathogens, and favorable pharmacokinetic profiles.8 In the treatment of urinary tract infections, the resolution of bacteriuria has been correlated with the concentration of the antimicrobial agent in the urine rather than serum levels.9 All the antimicrobial agents approved for the treatment of urinary tract infections achieve inhibitory urinary concentrations that significantly exceed serum levels. Also, agents such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or the fluoroquinolones that eradicate aerobic gram-negative flora but have little effect on the vaginal and fecal anaerobic flora seem to provide the best long-term cures for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.8
Resistance to antibiotics
Because most uncomplicated urinary tract infections are treated empirically, it is important for clinicians to recognize resistance patterns of uropathogens in the community to ensure that the most appropriate antimicrobial agent is chosen. Recent reports have demonstrated that the emergence of resistant uropathogens has had a tremendous effect on empiric therapy.7,10,11,12,13 The most dramatic increase in resistance in the past few years has been to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. A recent study that evaluated outpatient women aged 18 to 50 years in the Seattle area who had acute cystitis demonstrated that the prevalence of E coli resistance to trimethoprim and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole rose from 9% to 18% in 1992 and 1996, respectively. This study also showed that the resistance of E coli to β-lactams such as ampicillin and first-generation cephalosporins was 34% and 28%, respectively.10 To further delineate resistance in geographic regions, a national survey was conducted to analyze antimicrobial susceptibilities of urine isolates from female outpatients in 1998. The highest percentage of resistance to E coli (22%) was seen in the western United States (California, Oregon, and Washington), in contrast to the Northeast where resistance was lowest (10%).12 To date, E coli resistance to the fluoroquinolones and nitrofurantoin appears to be relatively low.12,14
What effect does resistance have on empiric therapy? A committee of the Infectious Disease Society of America recently reviewed the literature on antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and pyelonephritis in woman. The guidelines recommend trimethoprim or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as first-line empiric therapy only in communities where resistance to trimethoprim among the uropathogens is less than 10% to 20%.15
TREATMENT
The goal of antimicrobial therapy is to eliminate the infecting organisms from the urinary tract and provide the resolution of symptoms. Table 1 lists the drugs, their dosages, and wholesale costs. Clinicians should consider many factors when selecting an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection, such as the patient's allergy history, the cost and tolerability of the treatment, previous antibiotic therapy, and most important, the prevalence of resistance in the community.
Table 1.
Antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections
Drug | Dose, mg | Frequency | Duration, days | Cost per complete course, $* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sulfonamides | ||||
TMP-SMX | 160/800† | 2×/day | 3 | 6.30-8.80 |
TMP | 100 | 2×/day | 3 | 0.90-1.40 |
Fluoroquinolones | ||||
Norfloxacin (Noroxin)‡ | 400 | 2×/day | 3 | 22.80 |
Ciprofloxacin HCl (Cipro)‡ | 100-250 | 2×/day | 3 | 17.20-25.00 |
Levofloxacin (Levaquin)‡ | 250-500 | Daily | 3 | 21.90-25.60 |
Nitrofurantoin macrocrystals | ||||
(Macrodantin)‡ | 100 | 4×/day | 7 | 47.00 |
(Macrobid)‡ | 100 | 2×/day | 7 | 23.00 |
β-Lactams | ||||
Cefpodoxime (Vantin)‡ | 100 | 2×/day | 3 | 18.30 |
Cefixime (Suprax)‡ | 400 | Daily | 3 | 23.20 |
Cephalexin | 250-500 | 4×/day | 3 | 6.40-11.50 |
Amoxicillin | 250-500 | 3×/day | 3 | 2.10-3.50 |
Miscellaneous | ||||
Fosfomycin tromethamine (Monurol)‡ | 3,000 (3 g) | Daily | 1 | 30.00 |
TMP-SMX = trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; HCl = hydrochloride. |
Average wholesale price in 2001.
One double-strength tablet.
Proprietary names are given for information only and are not to be construed as endorsement by either the authors or wjm editors.
Single-dose regimens
Although single-dose therapy using β-lactams, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and fluoroquinolones have shown high cure rates, single-dose therapy is associated with a high rate of recurrence within 6 weeks of initial treatment. Reinfection may be due to the failure of single-dose treatment to eradicate gram-negative pathogens from the perianal area. Aminopenicillins and first-generation cephalosporins have shorter half-lives, which may contribute to their lower efficacy compared with other agents.16,17 The 1999 treatment guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America on uncomplicated urinary tract infections concluded that multiple-day regimens were more effective than single-dose regimens, especially for the aminopenicillins and first-generation cephalosporins.15 Single-dose therapy offers the advantages of increased compliance and a lower incidence of side effects.
Short-course therapy
Controlled trials of uncomplicated urinary tract infections have demonstrated that therapy for 3 days provided similar eradication rates and a lower incidence of side effects compared with 7 to 10 days of therapy.17,18,19 The guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America also concluded that 3-day regimens of trimethoprim, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and fluoroquinolones were more effective than single-dose regimens and that single-or 3-day regimens were better tolerated than longer regimens (7-10 days). Patients who may require 7 days of therapy include pregnant women, patients with diabetes mellitus, and those with symptoms lasting longer than 1 week.15 For uncomplicated cystitis, treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, or fluoroquinolones for 3 days should result in an eradication rate of greater than 90% with a low incidence of adverse effects.
RECURRENT URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS
Patients with three or more infections per year should be offered either continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis, patient-initiated, or postcoital prophylaxis if the onset of infection is linked to sexual intercourse (table 2).7 Before a prophylactic regimen is chosen, a urine culture should be performed to determine the susceptibility of the pathogen. The duration of continuous prophylactic therapy is usually 6 months to a year. Unfortunately, within 6 months of discontinuing antibiotic prophylaxis, 40% to 60% of women develop a urinary tract infection, and prophylaxis must be resumed.20 Patient-initiated therapy at the onset of symptoms has been shown to be effective in young, healthy nonpregnant women.21 Short-course regimens (as previously described) have been advocated for patient-initiated therapy in compliant women with frequently recurring and symptomatic urinary tract infections. The major advantages of short-course therapy over continuous therapy are convenience and the avoidance of antibiotic toxicity; symptomatic infections are not prevented, however. For postcoital prophylaxis, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or fluoroquinolones taken within 2 hours after sexual intercourse have been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of recurrent cystitis.22, 23
Table 2.
Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for recurrent infections
Drug | Dosage |
---|---|
Continuous daily prophylaxis for 6 mo | |
TMP-SMX | 40/200 mg* nightly or 3× /wk |
TMP-SMX | 100 mg nightly |
Nitrofurantoin | 50-100 mg nightly |
Norfloxacin | 200 mg a day |
Cephalexin | 250 mg a day |
Postcoital prophylaxis† | |
TMP-SMX | 40/200 mg* |
Nitrofurantoin | 50-100 mg |
Cephalexin | 250 mg |
TMP-SMX = trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. |
Half of a single-strength tablet.
Must be temporal in nature.
Antimicrobial agents
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has long been considered the standard of therapy for acute and recurrent urinary tract infections because of its activity against the most common uropathogens and its low cost and tolerability. The synergistic combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole works at two separate steps of the bacterial folate metabolism, resulting in the inhibition of DNA synthesis.
Patients with a sulfa allergy can receive trimethoprim alone because studies showed a similar cure rate as with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The most common side effects occurring in about 3% to 5% of patients are skin rash, nausea, and vomiting. More serious side effects such as anemia and Stevens-Johnson syndrome are rare, but patients should always be monitored for their occurrence. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be used with caution in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency or renal and hepatic impairment. The serum glucose-lowering effect of sulfonylureas (such as glipizide) may be enhanced by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Because the use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole may increase the risk of bleeding in patients taking sodium warfarin, the coadministration of these agents should be closely monitored.
Fluoroquinolones
The fluoroquinolones are broad-spectrum antibiotics that inhibit topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV. Although the spectrum of activity varies among the fluoroquinolones, they all have good to excellent activity against the clinically important gram-negative uropathogens, other Enterobacteriaceae, and S saprophyticus. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are the two most commonly used fluoroquinolones for urinary tract infections and cause minimal side effects such as nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, photosensitivity, and headache. Products that contain cations such as magnesium, aluminum, calcium, iron, zinc, or multivitamins with minerals may significantly decrease the absorption of the fluoroquinolones from the gastrointestinal tract. Patients should be advised to take fluoroquinolones 2 hours before or 4 hours after ingesting any product containing cations. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin may decrease the metabolism of caffeine and theophylline. Because the coadministration of warfarin and a fluoroquinolone may result in increased anticoagulation, patients taking this combination should be monitored. The use of fluoroquinolones is contraindicated in women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Not all fluoroquinolones can be used for urinary tract infections based on their pharmacokinetic profiles. Sparfloxacin and moxifloxacin achieve considerably lower concentrations in the urine than other quinolones and are not approved for this indication. Although the 8-methoxyquinolones, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, have an expanded spectrum of activity that includes improved anaerobic and gram-positive activity, they do not have any benefit in the treatment of urinary tract infections.
β-Lactams
In the past, β-lactam antibiotics such as first-generation cephalosporins (cephalexin) and the aminopenicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin) were routinely used to treat urinary tract infections. Although the first-generation cephalosporins and the aminopenicillins achieve high urinary concentrations, they are no longer recommended as first-line therapy for urinary tract infections because of resistance and higher recurrence rates compared with other agents.15 These agents should be used only if a urine culture documents susceptibility. However, third-generation cephalosporins such as cefixime and cefpodoxime offer the advantage of longer half-lives, which allows for less frequent dosing. Also, lower resistance rates to E coli have been observed with these agents than with the first-generation cephalosporins and aminopenicillins. These agents may be options for patients who are intolerant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or who have resistant infections.
The most common side effects of the β-lactams include rash, nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, and headache. The β-lactams inhibit bacterial wall synthesis. The use of cephalosporins and penicillins should be avoided in patients with a history of serious β-lactam allergy (anaphylaxis, hives).
Nitrofurantoin
Nitrofurantoin is available in two formulations, the macrocrystalline formulation (Macrodantin) and the monohydrate-macrocrystal form (Macrobid). Nitrofurantoin inhibits several bacterial enzyme systems involved with metabolism and possibly inhibits cell wall synthesis. Macrodantin requires dosing every 6 hours whereas Macrobid requires only twice-a-day dosing. About 90% of nitrofurantoin is renally excreted through glomerular filtration and tubular secretion. If the patient's estimated creatinine clearance is less than 0.83 mL per second (<50 mL per minute), antibacterial concentrations attained in the urine are inadequate; therefore, this drug should not be used. Side effects are minimal and may include malaise, cough, and dyspnea. Pulmonary fibrosis is rare and usually associated with therapy for longer than 6 months.
Fosfomycin tromethamine
Fosfomycin is a phosphoric acid derivative used only for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. It is administered as a one-time 3-gram oral dose. Fosfomycin inhibits pyruvyl transferase, which is an enzyme that catalyzes the first step in bacterial wall synthesis. Fosfomycin's spectrum of activity includes E coli, enterococci, and Serratia, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Klebsiella species but does not cover S saprophyticus. Fosfomycin is available as a powder that must be mixed with 3 to 4 oz of water before oral administration. Overall, it is well tolerated. Side effects that may occur include diarrhea (9%), nausea, vomiting, and esophageal discomfort.
SUMMARY
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or trimethoprim should be used as first-line therapy because of its low cost and efficacy for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women unless the prevalence of resistance to these agents among uropathogens in the community is greater than 10% to 20%. The fluoroquinolones are more expensive, broader in spectrum, and therefore, should be reserved for communities with rates of resistance to trimethoprim of greater than 10% to 20% or in patients who either cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or have recurrent urinary tract infections. Other options include a 7-day course of nitrofurantoin or a single dose of fosfomycin. The use of first-generation cephalosporins or aminopenicillins is generally not recommended because of high levels of resistance and recurrence. Although resistance to the third-generation cephalosporins is lower than to the first generation, these agents are considered third-line agents because of their cost and efficacy.
In an excellent review article, Gupta and others outlined the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women (see Figure).
Figure 1.
Algorithm for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (adapted from Gupta et al13 and used with permission). TMP-SMX = trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; UTI = urinary tract infections; DS = double-strength.
Competing interests: None declared
- In the past decade, resistance of uropathogens to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim has increased dramatically
- Three-day therapies appear to be optimal and provide similar eradication rates and a lower incidence of side effects than 7 to 10 days of therapy
- Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim are still considered first-line therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in areas where resistance in the community is less than 10% to 20%
- Fluoroquinolones should not be used as first-line drug therapy except in communities wherein resistance to trimethoprim is greater than 10% to 20% or in patients with risk factors for resistance
- In patients who have frequent bouts of recurrent uncomplicated cystitis, antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered to prevent infections
References
- 1.Orenstein R, Wong ES. Urinary tract infections in adults. Am Fam Physician 1999;59: 1225-1234, 1237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patton JP, Nash DB, Abrutyn E. Urinary tract infection: economic considerations. Med Clin North Am 1991;75: 495-513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bacheller CD, Bernstein JM. Urinary tract infections. Med Clin North Am 1997;81: 719-730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kunin CM. Urinary tract infections in females. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18: 1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strom BL, Collins M, West SL, Kreisberg J, Weller S. Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and other risk factors for symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria: a case-control study. Ann Intern Med 1987;107: 816-823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hooton TM, Scholes D, Hughes JP, et al. A prospective study of risk factors for symptomatic urinary tract infection in young women. N Engl J Med 1996;335: 468-474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11: 551-581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neu HC. Optimal characteristics of agents to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Infection 1992;20(suppl 4): S266-S271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stamey TA, Fair WR, Timothy MM, Millar MA, Mihara G, Lowery YC. Serum versus urinary antimicrobial concentrations in cure of urinary-tract infections. N Engl J Med 1974;291: 1159-1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gupta K, Scholes D, Stamm WE. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. JAMA 1999;281: 736-738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Talan DA, Stamm WE, Hooton TM, et al. Comparison of ciprofloxacin (7 days) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (14 days) for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women: a randomized trial. JAMA 2000;283: 1583-1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gupta K, Sahm DF, Mayfield D, Stamm WE. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens that cause community-acquired urinary tract infections in women: a nationwide analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33: 89-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gupta K, Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Increasing antimicrobial resistance and the management of uncomplicated community-acquired urinary tract infections. Ann Intern Med 2001;135: 41-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dyer IE, Sankary TM, Dawson JA. Antibiotic resistance in bacterial urinary tract infections, 1991 to 1997. West J Med 1998;169: 265-268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Warren JW, Abrutyn E, Hebel JR, Johnson JR, Schaeffer AJ, Stamm WE. Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Clin Infect Dis 1999;29: 745-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hooton TM, Running K, Stamm WE. Single-dose therapy for cystitis in women: a comparison of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin, and cyclacillin. JAMA 1985;253: 387-390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stamm WE, Hooton TM. Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med 1993;329: 1328-1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nygaard IE, Johnson JM. Urinary tract infections in elderly women. Am Fam Physician 1996;53: 175-182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Norrby SR. Short-term treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in women. Rev Infect Dis 1990;12: 458-467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stapleton A. Prevention of recurrent urinary-tract infections in women. Lancet 1999;353: 7-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gupta K, Hooton TM, Roberts PL, Stamm WE. Patient-initiated treatment of recurrent urinary tract infection in young women. Ann Intern Med 2001;135: 9-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Melekos MD, Asbach HW, Gerharz E, Zarakovitis IE, Weingaertner K, Naber KG. Post-intercourse versus daily ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infections in premenopausal women. J Urol 1997;157: 935-939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pfau A, Sacks TG. Effective postcoital quinolone prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections in women. J Urol 1994;152: 136-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]