Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 19;68(6):807–824. doi: 10.1007/s12576-018-0599-3

Table 2.

The cognitive performance for the Stroop and word-reading test in young and elderly subjects

Trial Stroop test Word-reading test Stroop interference time (s)
n Total time period (s) 100/total time period (answers/s) Number of errors n Total time period (s) 100/total time period (answers/s) Number of errors
Young subjects
 Tr 1 9 64.2 ± 4.8# 1.6 ± 0.1# 1.7 ± 0.7# 9 47.4 ± 2.0 2.1 ± 0.1 0 16.9 ± 3.0
 Tr 2 9 62.7 ± 3.8# 1.6 ± 0.1# 1.4 ± 0.6# 9 45.9 ± 1.4 2.2 ± 0.1 0 16.8 ± 2.8
 Tr 3 9 61.8 ± 3.5# 1.7 ± 0.1# 2.0 ± 0.9# 9 46.1 ± 1.1 2.2 ± 0.1 0 15.6 ± 2.6
 Tr 4 8 64.7 ± 4.2# 1.6 ± 0.1# 1.6 ± 0.5# 7 45.3 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 19.2 ± 4.5
Elderly subjects
 Tr 1 9 94.6 ± 4.9†,# 1.1 ± 0.1†,# 3.2 ± 0.6†,# 9 63.2 ± 2.8 1.6 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 31.4 ± 3.2
 Tr 2 9 90.7 ± 4.4†,# 1.1 ± 0.1†,# 3.0 ± 0.9†,# 9 59.6 ± 3.3 1.7 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 31.1 ± 2.3
 Tr 3 9 89.6 ± 4.4†,# 1.1 ± 0.1†,# 4.1 ± 0.9†,# 9 58.2 ± 2.5 1.7 ± 0.1 0 31.4 ± 3.3
 Tr 4 9 84.2 ± 3.8†,# 1.2 ± 0.1†,# 2.2 ± 0.7†,# 6 61.6 ± 4.5 1.7 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.4 26.8 ± 3.1

Values are mean ± SE. A difference in total periods between the Stroop and word-reading tests is considered as an interference period (Stroop interference time = total period for Stroop − total period for word-reading). n number of subjects

Significant difference (P < 0.05 by three-way ANOVA with a Dunnett post hoc test) between young and elderly subjects

#Significant difference (P < 0.05 by three-way ANOVA with the Dunnett post hoc test) between the Stroop and word-reading tests