Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 13;29(12):3212–3223. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02611-1

Extended Data Fig. 7. HIV-specific CD8+ T cell response among NSV, ART-suppressed, and viremic controller cohorts.

Extended Data Fig. 7

For Gag-specific CD8+ T cell response, we had n = 4, n = 6 and n = 8 responses for NSV, ART-suppressed and VC samples, respectively. For Pol-specific response, we had n = 1, n = 2 and n = 7 responses from NSV, ART-suppressed and VC samples, respectively. For Env-specific response, we had n = 2, n = 3 and n = 6 responses from NSV, ART-suppressed and VC samples, respectively. For Nef-specific response, we had n = 3, n = 5 and n = 6 responses from NSV, ART-suppressed and VC samples, respectively. Bars represented median values and error bars indicated 95% confidence interval. Two-sided Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect differences among three different cohorts. SFU, spot forming unit.