Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 13;14:8262. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44014-3

Table 2.

Cells and genes from esophageal biopsies after post-processing and analysis

Biopsy Cell counts All overlapping genes COSMIC genes p < 0.05 and K* > 1
PIDa Histology RNA DNA No. any p and K* No. p < 0.05 and K* > 1 No. Max K* (gene)
20 CARDb 249 342 6671 98 7 1.12 (MUC1)c
20 ESOd 181 339 7581 2 0
9 NDBEe 160 362 3783 35 4 1.01 (ERBB2)
14 NDBE 259 200 9213 8 0
16 NDBE 237 227 7217 0 0
6 LGDf 221 353 7818 58 0
19 LGD 354 317 8566 5 0
6 HGDg 189 312 8308 485 35 1.54 (ERBB2)
14 HGD 172 117 7282 2612 119 1.27 (CXCR4)
20 HGDh 233 339 7148 416 39 1.33 (PTPRC)
16 EACi 187 274 7713 244 20 1.46 (GNAS)

We measured the contribution of genomic mutations to transcriptomic changes by K* index of phylogenetic signal49. For each gene, the p-value was estimated by a one-sided random permutation test with 999 repetitions to test K* index against the null hypothesis of the gene expression values being randomly distributed in the phylogeny (n = number of DNA cells per biopsy).

aPatient identification number from the original study.

bHealthy gastric cardia.

cThe gene names are italicized according to the organism-specific formatting guidelines for humans.

dHealthy esophagus.

eNon-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus.

fLow-grade dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus.

gHigh-grade dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus.

hThe first of two HGD biopsies from this patient separated by at least 5 cm.

iEsophageal adenocarcinoma.