Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 7;103:18428. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v103.18428

Table IV.

Comparison of contact allergy frequencies between conscripts investigated for foot dermatitis and a control group of consecutively tested dermatitis patients aged 20-21 years

Test substances Conc. Conscripts Controls OR (95% CI)
Total na Positive test n (%) Total n Positive test n (%)
Nickel(ii)sulphate hexahydrate 5% pet 26 1 (3.8) 225 31 (14) 0.3 (0.04–2.7)
Colophonium 20% pet 26 13 (50) 228 1 (0.4) 220 (25–1,903)
4-tert-Butylphenolformaldehyde resin 1% pet 26 1 (3.8) 227 1 (0.5) 19 (1.1–335)
Phenol formaldehyde resin 2 (PFR2) 1% pet 26 3 (12) 227 2 (0.9) 9.7 (1.4–66)
Formaldehyde 2% aq 26 1 (3.8) 227 7 (3.1) 1.5 (0.2–14)
Peru balsam 25% pet 26 1 (3.8) 226 5 (2.2) 1.2 (0.1–11)
Fragrance mix I 14% pet 26 2 (7.7) 227 7 (3.1) 2.9 (0.5–21)
Fragrance mix II 8% pet 26 2 (7.7) 227 3 (1.3) 3.9 (0.6–26)
Hydroperoxides of linalool 1% pet 26 6 (23) 208 9 (4.3) 5.8 (1.8–19)
Hydroperoxides of limonene 0.3% pet 26 9 (35) 209 10 (4.8) 13 (4.3–42)

The conscripts were patch tested in 2022. The control group consisted of consecutively tested dermatitis patients aged 20–21 years investigated in the preceding 10 years (2012 to 2021). The data are based on the results of patch test reading on day 3 or 4.

a

total number included in the regression analyses.

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Conc.: concentration and vehicle; aq: aqua; pet: petrolatum. Bold figures indicate statistically significant results (95% CI > 1 or < 1).